WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 6239

Employment security: benefits; disqualification from receiving benefits when leaving employment; create exception for victim of domestic violence, gender violence, or sexual violence. Amends secs. 29 & 29a of 1936 (Ex Sess) PA 1 (MCL 421.29 & 421.29a).

2023-2024 Regular Session Introduced by Graham Filler and 1 co-sponsor

Michigan bill allows unemployment benefits for workers fleeing domestic violence, gender violence, or sexual violence despite voluntary job departure.

referred to second reading
#crimes:domesticviolence #employmentsecurity:benefits
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 6239

Legislative bill overview

HB 6239 modifies Michigan's unemployment insurance law to create an exception allowing individuals who voluntarily leave employment to still receive benefits if they did so due to being a victim of domestic violence, gender violence, or sexual violence. Currently, Michigan law typically disqualifies workers who voluntarily quit from receiving unemployment benefits, but this bill carves out a protected category for abuse survivors.

Why is this important

Survivors of domestic and sexual violence often face the impossible choice between staying in dangerous situations or losing their income support during job transitions. This policy recognizes that leaving unsafe employment is a legitimate reason for job separation and provides economic stability during what may be a vulnerable transition period. The bill addresses a real gap where abuse survivors could face financial hardship while attempting to escape harmful situations.

Potential points of contention

  • Definition scope: The precise definitions of "domestic violence," "gender violence," and "sexual violence" matter significantly—unclear boundaries could create disputes over eligibility or administrative burden for the unemployment agency to verify claims.
  • Verification burden: Determining victim status may require sensitive disclosures or documentation; concerns exist about privacy, re-traumatization, and whether survivors have accessible proof (particularly in cases without police reports or legal proceedings).
  • Fiscal impact: Expanding the pool of benefit-eligible workers increases unemployment insurance costs, which may affect employer contribution rates or state fund reserves.
  • Employment vs. safety trade-off: Some may question whether income support should be the primary policy tool versus workplace protection measures or employer accountability.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.