WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SF 1697

Employer refund request for employee training special assessments authorization provision and appropriation

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Rich Draheim and 1 co-sponsor

The bill would allow employers to request refunds for training costs funded by a state special assessment, with an appropriation to support the program.

Referred to Jobs and Economic Development
#employmentandeconomicdevelopmentdepartment #labor #employment #andlaborandindustrydepartment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 1697

Summary of SF 1697 (Minnesota, 2025-2026)

Overview

SF 1697 is a Minnesota bill titled “Employer refund request for employee training special assessments authorization provision and appropriation.” The bill’s primary aim appears to address the financing and reimbursement mechanisms related to employer-initiated employee training through a state-supported special assessment framework. The action history shows introduction and referral to the Jobs and Economic Development committee, with co-sponsors Eric Pratt and Rich Draheim.

  • Session: 2025-2026
  • Jurisdiction: Minnesota
  • Current status: Introduced and referred to the Jobs and Economic Development committee (as of 2025-02-20)

Purpose and Intent

The bill intends to authorize employers to request refunds related to trainer-supported employee training funded via a special assessment mechanism. It also includes provisions for appropriation, suggesting a state-funded or state-administered component to support training programs, with a potential mechanism for employers to recover certain costs or receive credits/reimbursements.

Key Provisions (as inferred from the title and typical structure)

Note: The exact statutory language is not provided in the summary, but the following elements are usually associated with this type of bill. The actual bill text would specify precise definitions, thresholds, and administrative processes.

  • Authorization for Employer Refund Requests: The bill would authorize employers to file requests for refunds tied to employee training funded under a special assessment program. This could involve recovering a portion of costs associated with mandated or incentivized training.
  • Employee Training Special Assessments: Establishment or continuation of a special assessment mechanism to fund employee training initiatives. This could involve levies, fees, or assessments on employers or specific industries, with proceeds used for training programs.
  • Administrative Procedures: Rules governing how refunds are requested, reviewed, and approved, including required documentation, timelines, and eligibility criteria.
  • Appropriation Provisions: The bill includes an appropriation, indicating a specific funding amount allocated by the legislature to support the program, administration, or related training initiatives.
  • Limits and Conditions: Possible caps on refund amounts, sunset dates, or performance metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of the training programs.
  • Reporting and Oversight: Provisions for reporting program outcomes to the Legislature and ensuring accountability in the use of funds.

Affected Parties

  • Employers: Potential beneficiaries (refunds) and/or contributors (through assessments) depending on the final structure. Employers may be able to request refunds for approved training expenditures.
  • Employees: Indirect beneficiaries through access to training—improved skills, certifications, and potential career advancement.
  • State Agencies: Likely involved in administering the program, processing refund requests, and managing appropriations and reporting.
  • Industries/Businesses: Depending on which sectors are covered by the special assessment, certain industries may be more impacted.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduction and Referral: The bill was introduced and referred to the Jobs and Economic Development committee on 2025-02-20.
  • Committee Process: As standard in Minnesota, the bill would proceed through committee hearings, potential amendments, and voting by the committee before moving to the full House/Senate for floor action.
  • Appropriation Timing: Any appropriation would be subject to the annual state budget process and relevant fiscal notes, typically aligned with biennial or annual appropriations cycles.
  • Effective Date: The bill would specify when the authorization and appropriation take effect (e.g., a particular fiscal year or upon enactment), and whether there are phased implementations or sunset provisions.

Potential Impacts and Considerations

  • Financial Impact: Creation of a funding stream via special assessments and a state appropriation; potential fiscal implications for both government budgeting and employer costs.
  • Labor and Workforce Development: Could enhance access to training, competency development, and workforce readiness if refunds reduce the net cost of employer-provided training.
  • Administrative Burden: Requires clear processes for filing refunds, verification of training expenditures, and annual reporting.

This summary reflects the bill’s stated title and available action history. For precise provisions, eligible refund amounts, specific assessment mechanisms, eligibility criteria, and fiscal details, the actual bill text and fiscal notes would be required.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.