WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 680

Employees, Employers - As introduced, prohibits an agricultural employer from retaliating against an agricultural employee who asserts a protected right or based on the agricultural employee's immigration status; creates related protections and penalties related to agricultural employees. - Amends TCA Title 4; Title 8; Title 43; Title 50 and Title 68.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Justin Jones

HB 680 prohibits Tennessee agricultural employers from retaliating against workers asserting legal rights or based on immigration status, extending labor protections to vulnerable farm workers.

Assigned to s/c Banking & Consumer Affairs Subcommittee
#employees #employers
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 680

Legislative bill overview

HB 680 prohibits agricultural employers in Tennessee from retaliating against workers who exercise legal rights or based on immigration status. The bill creates protective measures and establishes penalties for violations, amending multiple sections of Tennessee law covering employment, labor, and related regulatory codes.

Why is this important

Agricultural workers represent a significant portion of Tennessee's workforce but historically have had limited legal protections compared to other employment sectors. This bill addresses a real gap in labor protections by extending anti-retaliation safeguards to a vulnerable workforce that may fear job loss for asserting workplace rights or having uncertain immigration status.

Potential points of contention

  • Immigration enforcement vs. employment law: The prohibition on basing retaliation on immigration status may conflict with federal immigration enforcement priorities and employers' concerns about workforce documentation requirements under E-Verify and I-9 regulations.
  • Agricultural industry compliance costs: Farmers and agricultural employers—particularly smaller operations—may face increased administrative burdens and legal liability exposure, potentially affecting labor costs and operational practices.
  • Scope and enforcement mechanisms: The bill's actual penalties, enforcement procedures, and definitions of "protected rights" will be critical; ambiguity could lead to either weak protections or unintended consequences for agricultural employers.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.