WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 2272

Eminent Domain - As introduced, adds to the definition of "public use" for eminent domain a sidewalk, public greenway, bicycle lane, pedestrian way, or proper slope development associated with a road, highway, bridge, or other structure, facility, or project used for public transportation. - Amends TCA Section 29-17-102.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Richard Briggs

Tennessee bill expands eminent domain authority to seize private property for sidewalks, greenways, and bike lanes without clarifying compensation standards.

Withdrawn.
#eminentdomain
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 2272

Legislative bill overview

SB 2272 expands Tennessee's definition of "public use" under eminent domain law to explicitly include sidewalks, greenways, bicycle lanes, pedestrian ways, and slope developments associated with public transportation infrastructure. This clarification would enable government entities to more readily acquire private property for these types of projects through eminent domain proceedings.

Why is this important

Eminent domain allows governments to seize private property for "public use" with compensation, but the scope of what qualifies as public use is often legally contested. This bill would remove ambiguity around pedestrian and cycling infrastructure, potentially accelerating transportation projects but also affecting property owners' ability to resist such takings. The bill's withdrawal suggests legislative disagreement over this expansion of government seizure authority.

Potential points of contention

  • Property rights vs. public benefit: Expanding eminent domain authority prioritizes pedestrian/cycling infrastructure over individual property ownership, raising concerns among property rights advocates
  • Definitional scope creep: "Proper slope development associated with a road" is vague and could be interpreted broadly to justify takings for marginal infrastructure improvements
  • Fairness in compensation: The bill doesn't address whether current compensation mechanisms adequately value properties seized for bike lanes or greenways, which may have lower economic justification than traditional public works

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.