WeVote

Bill

Bill

S 1059

EMBRYOS, FETUSES, AND PREBORN CHILDREN – Amends and adds to existing law to establish provisions regarding applicability of the terms “embryo,” “fetus,” and “preborn child” in regards to a suit for wrongful death and the crimes of aggravated battery and homicide.

68th Legislature, 1st Regular Session (2025)

Extends criminal and civil protections to preborn children from fertilization, treating them as persons in homicide/assault law, with prospective, not retroactive, effect.

Reported Printed; referred to State Affairs
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 1059

Summary — S 1059: "Idaho Prenatal Equal Protection Act"

Status: Reported Printed; referred to State Affairs. Introduced March 13, 2025. Emergency clause — effective on passage.

Purpose
- Declares the Legislature’s intent to extend criminal and civil legal protections to “preborn children” and to ensure “equal protection of the laws” for preborn persons from the moment of fertilization.
- States intent to protect pregnant mothers from coercion to have abortions and to remove statutory provisions the sponsors view as creating unequal protection for preborn persons.

Key definitions and scope
- “Preborn child” (new definition used throughout): “a living human being before birth from the beginning of biological development at the moment of fertilization upon the fusion of a human spermatozoon with a human ovum.”
- The bill applies prospectively only — it does not apply to acts or omissions that occurred before the law’s effective date.

Major provisions (by statutory change)
- New Section 5-311A (adds to Chapter 3, Title 5): Declares that, for purposes of section 5-311 (wrongful death), the term “person” includes a preborn child. Establishes the fertilization-based definition and prospective-only application.
- Amends Section 18-907 (aggravated battery): Revises the subsection dealing with injury to a pregnant female’s embryo or fetus. Removes an existing definition and certain prosecution exemptions (technical corrections referenced).
- New Section 18-926 (adds to Chapter 9, Title 18 — homicide provisions):
- States “embryo”/“fetus” means a preborn child.
- Directs that enforcement relating to a preborn child be subject to the same presumptions, defenses, justifications, immunities, and clemencies that apply to homicide of a born human.
- Creates specific exceptions where the section does NOT apply: (a) unintentional death resulting from life‑saving procedures for the mother (when reasonable steps to save the preborn child were taken, if available); and (b) spontaneous miscarriage.
- Reiterates prospective-only application and declares these provisions prevail over conflicting laws.
- Repeals Section 18-4016 (prior statutory definition/protections concerning human embryo and fetus).
- New Section 18-4018 (adds to Chapter 40, Title 18): Mirrors the 18-926 language for the chapter’s purposes (definition, parity with homicide rules, exceptions, prospective application).

Who would be affected
- Pregnant persons and preborn children (as newly defined) — both in civil wrongful-death claims and in criminal prosecutions.
- Medical providers and emergency responders (life-saving exceptions provided, but potential new legal exposure in other circumstances).
- Persons who assault pregnant individuals or whose conduct results in death or injury to a preborn child — subject to homicide/assault statutes treated similarly to those for born persons.
- Law enforcement and courts — may see new or changed charges and civil claims; fiscal note projects enforcement within existing agency resources.

Fiscal and procedural notes
- Fiscal note attached by a bill proponent states no anticipated impact on the general fund; enforcement expected to be managed with existing resources.
- The bill contains an emergency clause making it effective upon passage.
- Procedural history: introduced 3/13/2025; read twice and referred to Judiciary; reported printed and referred to State Affairs; hearings have been scheduled (late 2025).

Points to note
- The bill is expressly prospective (not retroactive).
- It repeals and replaces existing statutory language that previously limited or exempted certain prosecutions relating to embryos/fetuses.
- Because the measure alters criminal definitions and the scope of potential homicide and aggravated battery charges, it could lead to litigation over application and constitutionality; the summary notes only statutory changes, not predicted judicial outcomes.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.