WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 868

Due Process in Law Enforcement Officers Field Drug Testing.

2025-2026 Session Introduced by Mary Belk and 8 co-sponsors

Requires corroborating lab analysis before arrest, charges, or conviction based on colorimetric field drug tests, and allows limited release or plea withdrawal if later tests negat

Passed 1st Reading
#controlledsubstances;courts;criminalprocedure;drug&alcoholtesting;emergencyservices;evidence;lawenforcement;parole&probation;inmates;public;sentencing;testing
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 868

Summary — HB 868: Due Process in Law Enforcement Officers’ Field Drug Testing (NC, 2025)

Status & Key Dates
- Title: Due Process in Law Enforcement Officers Field Drug Testing
- Jurisdiction: North Carolina General Assembly (House Bill 868, 2025)
- Sponsors (primary): Representatives Rubin and Chesser
- Legislative status (excerpt): Passed first reading; referred to Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House.
- Effective date: December 1, 2025. Applies to offenses committed on or after that date.
- Agency/policy deadline: All law enforcement agencies and prosecutorial districts must adopt required policies no later than January 1, 2026.

Purpose / Intent
- To limit arrests, charging, and conviction reliance on presumptive colorimetric field drug tests (chemical color-reagent kits) because of documented false‑positive rates, while preserving tools to address dangerous controlled substances (e.g., fentanyl). The bill emphasizes due process and the need for reliable confirmation before prosecutorial actions and sentencing.

What the bill does — principal provisions
1. Definitions (G.S. 90‑95(f1)):
- “Colorimetric field drug test”: reagent-based field kits that produce color changes to preliminarily identify drugs (excludes thin-layer chromatography kits and tests on body fluids).
- “Corroborating chemical analysis”: confirmatory lab testing performed by the North Carolina State Crime Laboratory or a laboratory meeting comparable standards.

  1. Required policies (G.S. 90‑95(f2)):

    • By Jan 1, 2026, every law enforcement agency and prosecutorial district must adopt policies governing arrests and prosecutions for simple possession (G.S. 90‑95(a)(3)) that ensure reliable identification of controlled substances. Minimum required rules:
      • A colorimetric field test alone is not sufficient to establish (a) probable cause to arrest, (b) initiation of charges, (c) conviction, or (d) sentencing.
      • If a field test is used but no corroborating lab analysis has been completed, the person charged should either be (i) cited and released (where permitted by law) or (ii) released on a written promise to appear (pretrial release conditions under G.S. 15A‑534). These measures apply only to the drug‑possession charge and not to other charges that may be pending.
      • A defendant who pleads and later receives a corroborating chemical analysis showing no controlled substance in the tested sample may withdraw the plea and move to dismiss the charge.

  2. Bail / pretrial release (new G.S. 15A‑534.9):

    • When setting pretrial release conditions for a possession charge, courts must apply the provisions required in G.S. 90‑95(f2) for that charge.

Anticipated effects / considerations
- Procedural: Moves prosecutions away from reliance on presumptive field tests toward lab-confirmed evidence; creates an express statutory right to limited release and to withdraw pleas where later lab results negate the substance allegation.
- Operational: Law enforcement agencies and prosecutors must adopt policies and may need to adjust arrest/charging practices, training, documentation procedures, and logistics for timely lab submissions and confirmations.
- Public safety & due process balance: Seeks to reduce wrongful arrests/convictions tied to false positive field tests while retaining prosecutorial authority when corroborating chemical analyses are available.

Scope & Limitations
- The bill targets colorimetric field tests and possession charges under G.S. 90‑95(a)(3); it does not prohibit use of field tests for investigative purposes nor affect other crimes or other forms of testing (e.g., TLC or body‑fluid analyses are excluded from the definition).
- Corroborating analysis must meet recognized laboratory standards (explicitly names the NC State Crime Laboratory or equivalent).

References in bill
- Amends G.S. 90‑95 and adds G.S. 15A‑534.9 in the North Carolina General Statutes.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.