WeVote

Bill

Bill

SB 2462

District Attorneys - As introduced, revises the data that district attorneys general are required to include in the annual report submitted to various officials and the public; requires the clerk of every court having jurisdiction over misdemeanor and felony cases to provide the district attorneys general conference direct and unlimited access to the clerk's case management or reporting system for the purposes of complying with the district attorneys general conference's and district attorneys general's statutory reporting requirements. - Amends TCA Title 4 and Title 8.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Paul Bailey

The bill expands DAG reporting data and gives clerks direct, unlimited access to case systems to collect it, with reimbursement for clerks.

Companion House Bill substituted
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 2462

Summary of SB 2462 / HB 2466 (TN 114th Session)

Date introduced: 2026

Jurisdiction: Tennessee

Title: District Attorneys – Data reporting enhancements and clerks’ access to case management systems

Purpose and intent
- To revise and expand the data that district attorneys general (DAGs) are required to include in annual reports.
- To provide direct, unlimited access for the district attorneys general conference (DAGC) to clerks’ case management or reporting systems for purposes of collecting and reporting data.
- To authorize the District Attorneys General Conference to reimburse clerks for reasonable costs incurred in furnishing the required data.
- To align data collection and reporting with statewide and district-level criminal justice data needs.

Key provisions and changes

1) Annual reporting by DAGs (amended § 8-7-115)
- DAGs must prepare an annual report by March 1 each year.
- Recipients of the report include the governor, the speakers of the House and Senate, the appropriate chairs, and the DAGC; the report must also be available to the public upon request.
- Required data (aggregate, non-personally identifying) for the previous year, categorized by offense:
- (1) Number of indictments filed.
- (2) Number of cases transferred for pro tem prosecution under § 8-7-106.
- (3) Dispositions entered by criminal or circuit courts in the district attorney general’s judicial district (including dismissals, pretrial diversions, plea agreements, trial outcomes, and sentences).
- The section clarifies that DAGs may collect data using any method that fits their local systems; no single designated system is mandated.

2) Clerk access to data systems (new authority in multiple sections)
- Clerks of every court with misdemeanor and felony jurisdiction must provide direct, unlimited access to their case management or reporting system to:
- Each DAG in the clerk’s judicial district.
- The DAGC.
- Purpose: to comply with duties to collect and analyze data required by the statute.
- Clerks must cooperate and provide all data upon request.

3) Data for statewide reporting (amended § 8-7-314)
- Clerks must provide direct, unlimited access to their case management system to the DAGC to support compiling the statewide report required by § 8-7-314.
- Clerks must cooperate and furnish requested data.

4) Clerks’ data duties (amended in § 4-1-425(f))
- Similar access obligation for clerks exercising criminal jurisdiction to provide data to the DAGC for the purpose of data collection and analysis.
- Clerks must cooperate and supply requested information.

5) Effective date
- General effective date: July 1, 2026, at 12:01 a.m., for non-U.S. persons data; data collection provisions otherwise become effective upon law.
- The act ultimately requires DAGC to reimburse clerks for reasonable and necessary costs incurred to provide data.

Fiscal notes and impact

  • Local expenditures: Potential increases due to expanded access in case management systems and added data-gathering duties. The exact amount is uncertain and varies by county and vendor.
  • Example: In Lawrence County, adding additional users could incur about $10,000 annually (vendor-based per-user charges).
  • State-level impact: DAGC may incur costs to reimburse clerks for data provision; the total impact depends on the level of reimbursement authorized and actual costs incurred.
  • Overall: The fiscal notes indicate the changes are implementable with existing resources per the DAGC, but exact costs depend on county-specific system configurations and vendor charges.

Effective implementation

  • The amended provisions are designed to ensure more comprehensive, standardized data reporting from DAGs while giving clerks the necessary access to fulfill these duties.
  • Reimbursement provisions aim to offset clerks’ data-provision costs.

Who is affected

  • District Attorneys General (DAGs) and their offices (reporting requirements).
  • District Attorneys General Conference (DAGC) (data collection and potential reimbursement responsibilities).
  • Clerks of courts with jurisdiction over misdemeanor and felony cases (data access obligations and cooperation duties).
  • The general public (via public availability of annual reports on request).

Timeline highlights

  • July 1, 2026: Primary effective date for non-U.S.-related data provisions; other data provisions become effective on that date unless otherwise specified.
  • Annual reporting deadline: March 1 each year.

Notes

  • The bill’s amendments emphasize non-personally identifying aggregate data and provide flexibility in how districts collect data.
  • The amendments authorize reimbursement to clerks for the costs of providing data, subject to subsequent appropriations or DAGC actions.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.