WeVote

Bill

Bill

A 3517

Directs the department of health to study on the long-term safety of tattoo ink and issue a report making recommendations for tattoo ink labeling

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Pat Burke

Directs the Department of Health to study the long-term safety of tattoo ink and issue labeling recommendations to guide future ink labeling standards.

REFERRED TO HEALTH
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 3517

Bill Summary: A 3517

Overview

  • Bill Number: A 3517
  • Title: Directs the department of health to study the long-term safety of tattoo ink and issue a report making recommendations for tattoo ink labeling
  • Sponsor: Patrick Burke (primary)
  • Status: REFERRED TO HEALTH
  • Introduced: January 28, 2025
  • Classification: Bill
  • Legislative Actions: 2025-01-28: REFERRED TO HEALTH (listed twice)

Purpose and intent

The bill directs the state Department of Health to undertake a study on the long-term safety of tattoo ink and to issue a report that includes recommendations for labeling tattoo inks. The objective is to assess potential long-term health risks associated with tattoo inks and to inform labeling standards or requirements.

Key provisions

  • Require the Department of Health to conduct a study examining the long-term safety of tattoo ink.
  • Require the department to issue a report detailing findings and to include recommendations for labeling tattoo inks.
  • No specific deadlines, funding, or regulatory standards are stated in the provided text.

Who would be affected

  • Tattoo ink manufacturers and suppliers: potential future labeling requirements could impact product labeling practices.
  • Tattoo artists and studios: may receive labeling standards to follow if adopted; impacts on product sourcing and disclosure practices.
  • Consumers/patients receiving tattoos: potential for increased transparency about ink ingredients and safety information.
  • Department of Health and related agencies: responsible for conducting the study and producing the labeling recommendations report.

Timeline and procedural context

  • The bill has been introduced and referred to the Health committee. No further actions, deadlines, or fiscal details are provided in the available information.
  • The presence of related bills from prior sessions (A 9111 and A 3455) suggests ongoing consideration of tattoo ink safety and labeling in the Legislature.

Background and related bills

  • Related bills from prior sessions: A 9111, A 3455. These connections may reflect continued interest in evaluating tattoo ink safety and labeling standards.

Potential impact and considerations

  • If enacted, the bill would prompt an official assessment of long-term health risks from tattoo inks and produce labeling recommendations that could influence future regulatory or industry standards.
  • The extent of impact depends on the content of the final labeling recommendations and any subsequent legislative or regulatory actions implementing those recommendations.
  • As currently described, the bill establishes the study and reporting requirement but does not specify implementation deadlines or funding.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.