WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

A 6260

Directs a full cost benefit analysis of the technical and economic feasibility of renewable energy systems in the state of New York and to compare such directly with other methods of electricity generation

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Joe Angelino and 36 co-sponsors

Requires a full cost-benefit analysis of renewables in New York, with a direct comparison to other electricity generation methods to inform policy, planning, and investment.

REFERRED TO ENERGY
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 6260

Bill Summary: New York Assembly Bill A 6260 (2025)

Overview

A 6260 directs a full cost-benefit analysis of the technical and economic feasibility of renewable energy systems in New York State and requires a direct comparison of renewables with other electricity generation methods. The bill was introduced on February 27, 2025 and referred to the Assembly Committee on Energy.

Purpose and Intent

  • To evaluate whether renewable energy systems are technically feasible and economically viable in New York.
  • To provide a direct, side-by-side comparison of renewables with alternative methods of electricity generation, informing future energy policy and decision-making.

Key Provisions (as presented)

  • Mandates a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis of renewable energy systems operating or potentially operable within New York State.
  • Requires the analysis to assess both technical feasibility and economic viability.
  • Requires a direct comparison between renewable energy systems and other electricity generation methods (e.g., conventional or non-renewable options).
  • The bill would guide policymakers with an evidence-based assessment of the relative costs, benefits, and trade-offs of pursuing renewable energy versus alternative generation approaches.

Note: The exact methodology, entities responsible for conducting the analysis, and any reporting deadlines or deliverables are not specified in the provided information.

Scope and Affected Parties

  • State government energy policy and planning processes in New York.
  • Stakeholders in the energy sector, including renewable energy developers, traditional generators, consumers, and environmental planning bodies, would be affected by the resulting analysis and potential policy implications.
  • The bill’s reach appears to be statewide, influencing energy strategy and regulatory considerations.

Legislative History and Sponsors

  • Status: REFERRED TO ENERGY (February 27, 2025).
  • Primary Sponsor: Philip Palmesano.
  • Cosponsors: A broad list including Robert Smullen, John Lemondes, Matthew Simpson, William A. Barclay, Brian Manktelow, Edward Ra, Joseph Sempolinski, Angelo J. Morinello, Michael Tannousis, Jeff Gallahan, Paula Bologna, Chris Tague, Scott Gray, Jerett Gandolfo, Joe DeStefano, Doug Smith, Josh Jensen, Michael J. Fitzpatrick, Karl Brabenec, Jodi Giglio, David McDonough, Christopher Friend, Brian D. Miller, Lester Chang, Andrea Bailey, Andrew Molitor, Keith Brown, Joe Angelino, John K. Mikulin, Michael Durso, Joseph DeStefano (note: some names appear with minor duplications in the provided list), Philip Palmesano (primary), Matthew Slater, Mike Reilly, Mary Beth Walsh, Kenneth Blankenbush, Stephen Hawley, Patrick Chludzinski.

Related Legislation

  • Related Bills from prior sessions: A 7524 and A 5198.
  • Senate companion: S 1470 (listed as companion) with at least one chamber noted as companion in the provided information.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • The bill’s current action is referral to the Energy Committee, indicating it is at the initial stage of the legislative process.
  • No specific dates for hearings, votes, or final passage are provided in the available information.

Potential Impacts and Considerations

  • If enacted, the analysis could influence future energy policy by clarifying the cost-effectiveness of renewables relative to other generation methods.
  • Results could affect investment decisions, regulatory priorities, and state energy planning, potentially shaping subsidies, incentives, or procurement strategies.
  • The absence of detailed implementation requirements in the provided materials means future amendments or committee actions could define the scope, timeline, responsible agencies, and reporting requirements.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to emphasize potential fiscal, environmental, or regulatory implications once the bill’s full text or committee memos become available.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.