WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 2755

Directing the university of Kansas to operate a statewide repository of anonymous human trafficking data that is submitted by law enforcement agencies and prosecutors.

2025-2026 Regular Session

Creates a KU-run statewide, anonymous data repository for human trafficking, fed by law enforcement and prosecutors, to inform policy while protecting privacy.

Died in Committee
#collegesanduniversities #lawenforcement
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 2755

Overview

HB 2755 (Kansas, 2025-2026) directs the University of Kansas to operate a statewide repository of anonymous human trafficking data. The data would be supplied by law enforcement agencies and prosecutors. The bill was introduced and referred to the House Judiciary Committee but died in committee on April 10, 2026.

Purpose and Intent

  • Establish a centralized, statewide repository to collect and maintain anonymous data related to human trafficking.
  • Require collaboration among law enforcement agencies and prosecutors to submit data to the repository.
  • Enable policymakers, researchers, and public agencies to access aggregated information to better understand the scope, patterns, and trends of human trafficking within the state.

Key Provisions and Changes

  • Governmental Role: The University of Kansas would operate the statewide data repository.
  • Data Source: Submissions would come from law enforcement agencies and prosecutors.
  • Anonymity: Data submitted to the repository must be anonymous, protecting identifying information.
  • Scope of Data: While not specified in the summary, typical data elements for such repositories include incident type, location, timing, demographic characteristics (in aggregate), case disposition, and outcome. The bill would govern what data qualifies and how it’s categorized.
  • Access and Use: The legislation would authorize the repository to collect, store, and presumably provide access to aggregated data to appropriate state entities, researchers, and possibly public reporting mechanisms.
  • Oversight and Compliance: The bill would outline any reporting requirements, data standards, and compliance mechanisms to ensure proper data handling, privacy, and security.
  • Funding and Resources: The summary does not specify funding; however, operating a university-based data repository would typically entail budgeting for personnel, IT infrastructure, data security, and maintenance.

Who Would Be Affected

  • Primary: The University of Kansas, which would staff and maintain the repository.
  • Data Contributors: Law enforcement agencies and prosecutors responsible for submitting anonymized data.
  • Data Users: State agencies, policymakers, researchers, and potentially the public (through aggregated reporting), who would rely on the repository for insights into human trafficking trends.
  • Subjects: Individuals represented in the data would be anonymized; the bill emphasizes privacy protections to prevent disclosure of identities.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduction: Introduced into the Kansas House.
  • Referral: Referred to House Committee on Judiciary on February 6, 2026.
  • Action: Died in Committee on April 10, 2026, meaning the bill did not advance to the House floor for debate or further consideration in that session.
  • Implications of “Died in Committee”: The bill would require new sponsorship or reintroduction in a future session to pursue passage, and it would need to clear committee and leadership hurdles again to become law.

Potential Impacts and Considerations

  • Policy Impact: If enacted, the repository could enhance data-driven understanding of human trafficking in Kansas, informing law enforcement strategies, victim support programs, and policy interventions.
  • Privacy and Security: Anonymous data reduces privacy risks, but the bill would need robust standards to prevent re-identification and to secure the repository from data breaches.
  • Interagency Collaboration: Success depends on consistent data submission from diverse law enforcement agencies and prosecutors, plus reliable data harmonization.
  • Resource Allocation: University operation would require sustained funding, cybersecurity measures, and data governance expertise.

If you’d like, I can compare this bill to prior Kansas efforts on trafficking data collection or draft a grid of potential data fields and privacy safeguards commonly used in similar statewide repositories.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.