Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

Bill Overview

• Name and type: HConRes 104 (House Concurrent Resolution)
• Session: 119
• Jurisdiction: United States
• Title: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran
• Sponsorship: Co-sponsor – Shontel Brown
• Action to date: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs (2026-05-20); submitted in the House (2026-05-20)

Purpose and Intent

• The measure directs the President to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran, invoking the War Powers Resolution (WPR), specifically section 5(c).
• In practical terms, the resolution expresses the sense of Congress that U.S. military forces should be withdrawn from ongoing hostilities with Iran and the President should implement a course of action consistent with that directive under the WPR framework.

Key Provisions

• Formal direction to the President: The resolution explicitly directs the President to discontinue U.S. armed hostilities against Iran.
• War Powers Resolution reference: It relies on section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution to structure the withdrawal and related actions, which governs notification and timelines for Congressional consultation and actions regarding hostilities.
• Congressional stance: The measure communicates Congress’s position on ongoing hostilities with Iran and serves as a formal congressional demand rather than a standalone authorization or funding provision.

Who/What Is Affected

• U.S. Armed Forces: Potentially impacted by a mandated withdrawal from hostilities with Iran.
• Executive Branch (President and relevant defense/military agencies): Responsible for carrying out the withdrawal and ensuring compliance with the WPR directive.
• Congress: The resolution reflects a legislative stance and establishes a formal instruction under the War Powers framework.
• Timelines and procedures: Any actions to implement the withdrawal would involve the President coordinating with specified procedures under the War Powers Resolution.

Procedural and Timeline Considerations

• Procedural path: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs for consideration; introduction and referral are typical steps in the legislative process for concurrent resolutions.
• Enactment status: As a concurrent resolution, it would not become law or directly constrain future executive actions in the same way as statutes, but it expresses Congressional intent and could influence executive decisions and oversight.
• War Powers mechanics: The bill leverages WPR section 5(c), which governs Congressional notification and potential steps in the event of hostilities, and dictates how Congress may respond if the President does not comply.

Potential Impacts and Considerations

• Operational: If enacted in a binding sense, could prompt a formal withdrawal of U.S. forces from hostilities with Iran, subject to executive interpretation and WPR procedures.
• Diplomatic implications: A withdrawal directive could affect ongoing military missions, allied coordination, and regional security dynamics in the Middle East.
• Legal/policy precedent: Reinforces Congressional perspective on use of force and the role of Congress under the War Powers framework regarding Iran-related hostilities.

Note: As a concurrent resolution, the bill primarily expresses Congressional intent and does not itself authorize funding or military action. Readers should monitor subsequent floor action, amendments, and any related committee reports for further clarifications on scope and implementation.