WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HRES 1100

Directing the Committee on Ethics to preserve and publicly release records of the Committee's review of violations or alleged violations of clause 9 (as it pertains to acts of sexual harassment) and clause 18 of rule XXIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives.

119th Congress Introduced by Nancy Mace

Resolution requires House Ethics Committee to publicly release investigation records on congressional sexual harassment violations and related ethics breaches.

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
22
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HRES 1100

Legislative bill overview

HRES 1100 directs the House Committee on Ethics to preserve and publicly release records of its investigations into sexual harassment violations and related ethics breaches by House members. The bill specifically targets reviews of violations under clause 9 (sexual harassment) and clause 18 of rule XXIII of the House Rules. This represents a significant transparency measure regarding previously confidential ethics proceedings.

Why is this important

Ethics Committee investigations have historically been conducted with substantial confidentiality protections, limiting public access to findings and evidence. Public disclosure of these records would increase accountability for members accused of sexual harassment and allow constituents to make informed decisions about their representatives. This directly addresses concerns about institutional transparency and the handling of sexual misconduct allegations within Congress.

Potential points of contention

  • Confidentiality vs. transparency trade-off: The Ethics Committee's traditional confidentiality protections serve to protect the accused from public prejudgment and encourage witnesses to cooperate; public release could compromise these objectives and deter future complaints
  • Privacy and due process concerns: Releasing investigation records could expose accusers to public identification and retaliation, and may violate privacy rights of individuals mentioned in investigations who were not ultimately found to have violated rules
  • Selective disclosure precedent: Applying transparency rules only to sexual harassment cases raises questions about why other ethics violations aren't similarly disclosed, and could create inconsistent treatment across complaint categories

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.