Decoupling from Foreign Adversarial Battery Dependence Act

119th Congress Introduced by Carlos Giménez and 4 co-sponsors

HR 1166 boosts U.S. battery production by offering incentives, enhancing supply chain security, and funding research to reduce reliance on foreign adversaries.

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Purpose and Intent

The Decoupling from Foreign Adversarial Battery Dependence Act (HR 1166) aims to reduce the United States' reliance on foreign adversaries for battery technology, particularly in the context of national security and economic independence. The bill seeks to promote domestic production and innovation in battery manufacturing, thereby enhancing the resilience of the U.S. supply chain against potential disruptions from foreign adversarial nations.

Key Provisions

Domestic Production Incentives: The bill proposes various incentives for companies engaged in the domestic production of battery technologies. This may include tax credits, grants, and research funding aimed at fostering innovation in battery manufacturing.

Supply Chain Security: HR 1166 emphasizes the need for a secure supply chain for critical battery components, particularly those used in electric vehicles and renewable energy technologies. The bill may mandate assessments of supply chain vulnerabilities and the development of strategies to mitigate risks associated with foreign dependency.

Research and Development: The legislation allocates funding for research and development initiatives focused on advanced battery technologies, including but not limited to lithium-ion, solid-state, and alternative battery chemistries.

Collaboration with Industry: The bill encourages partnerships between government entities and private sector companies to advance battery technology and manufacturing capabilities within the U.S.

Affected Parties

Battery Manufacturers: Companies involved in the production of batteries will be directly impacted, as they may benefit from new incentives and funding opportunities.

Automotive and Renewable Energy Sectors: Industries relying on battery technology, such as electric vehicle manufacturers and renewable energy providers, will likely see changes in supply chain dynamics and production costs.

National Security Agencies: Agencies focused on national security will be involved in assessing and implementing the provisions of the bill, particularly those related to supply chain security.

Legislative Timeline

Introduced: February 10, 2025

House Actions:

Passed in the House on March 10, 2025, after a 40-minute debate and a voice vote.
Motion to reconsider was laid on the table without objection.

Senate Actions:

Received in the Senate on March 11, 2025, where it was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Related Legislation

S 450: A companion bill in the Senate that addresses similar issues regarding battery technology and supply chain security.

This summary provides an overview of HR 1166, highlighting its purpose, key provisions, affected parties, and legislative timeline. The bill represents a significant step towards enhancing U.S. independence in battery technology and securing critical supply chains against foreign adversarial influences.

Bill