WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 2109

Damages - As enacted, establishes a cause of action for persons to seek damages from persons who compensate others to participate in demonstrations when the paid demonstrators' conduct satisfies the elements of the criminal offense of rioting, or other similar offenses. - Amends TCA Title 29; Title 38 and Title 50.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Clark Boyd

Tennessee bill creates civil liability for funding protest participants whose conduct constitutes rioting, allowing victims to sue financial organizers of demonstrations.

Comp. SB subst.
#damages
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 2109

Legislative bill overview

HB 2109 creates a civil lawsuit right allowing individuals to sue anyone who pays people to participate in demonstrations if those paid demonstrators' actions meet the legal definition of rioting or similar criminal offenses. The bill amends Tennessee code sections related to damages, torts, and civil procedures.

Why is this important

This bill addresses concerns about organized protests potentially funded by outside parties, allowing victims of riot-related conduct to pursue civil damages against financial organizers—not just the demonstrators themselves. It represents a shift in legal liability from individuals committing acts to those allegedly funding protest activities.

Potential points of contention

  • First Amendment concerns: Critics may argue this chills free speech and assembly rights by creating liability for funding protected political expression, even if some participants break laws
  • Defining "compensation": Ambiguity about what constitutes compensating demonstrators (travel reimbursement? meals? bail funds?) could lead to broad interpretations affecting legitimate protest support
  • Proof and causation challenges: Plaintiffs must prove someone paid protesters AND those specific paid individuals committed rioting—establishing direct causation could be legally complex and encourage frivolous suits
  • Selective enforcement risk: The law could be weaponized against disfavored political movements while being overlooked for others, raising equal protection questions

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.