WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 2430

Criminal Offenses - As introduced, requires a posted sign or notice intended to warn violators that trespassers by motor vehicle will be prosecuted to clearly define the area in which driving, parking, standing, or otherwise operating a motor vehicle is prohibited. - Amends TCA Title 39.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Rusty Crowe

Tennessee bill requiring trespass warning signs to precisely define prohibited motor vehicle areas to strengthen legal enforcement and clarify property owner notice obligations.

Placed on Senate Finance, Ways, and Means Committee calendar for 4/20/2026
#criminaloffenses
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 2430

Legislative bill overview

SB 2430 amends Tennessee criminal law to require that warning signs for motor vehicle trespass must clearly and specifically define the prohibited area—such as where driving, parking, standing, or operating a motor vehicle is banned. Currently, the law may allow more general or ambiguous signage. This clarification applies to prosecutions under TCA Title 39 (criminal offenses).

Why is this important

Property owners rely on trespass laws to protect their land, but vague signage can create legal disputes about whether a violator had adequate notice. This bill aims to strengthen enforcement by requiring precise boundaries, potentially reducing dismissed cases and frivolous trespass claims while protecting property rights. It also affects landowners' obligations—they must now post more detailed warnings rather than generic "no trespassing" signs.

Potential points of contention

  • Burden on property owners: Requiring detailed, clearly-marked boundaries may increase costs and administrative complexity for rural landowners with large properties
  • Enforcement discretion: The phrase "clearly define" is somewhat subjective; disputes could arise over whether specific signage meets the standard, creating new litigation
  • Balancing notice requirements: Stricter sign requirements may inadvertently shield trespassers who claim insufficient warning, while property owners argue they shouldn't need surveyor-level precision for basic rights protection

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.