WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 1170

Criminal Offenses - As introduced, removes the killing of another committed in the perpetration of or attempt to perpetrate certain crimes from the elements of first degree murder; deletes the offense of criminal responsibility for conduct of another; deletes the offense of criminal responsibility for the facilitation of a felony. - Amends TCA Title 39, Chapter 11; Title 39, Chapter 12; Title 39, Chapter 13; Title 39, Chapter 14; Title 40, Chapter 24; Title 40, Chapter 35 and Title 40, Chapter 39.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Raumesh Akbari

Tennessee bill eliminates felony murder rule and accomplice liability, narrowing when deaths during crimes can result in murder charges without direct intent to kill.

Sponsor(s) Added.
#criminaloffenses
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 1170

Legislative bill overview

SB 1170 would remove the felony murder rule from Tennessee's first-degree murder statute, eliminating the ability to charge someone with first-degree murder for a death occurring during the commission of certain dangerous felonies without direct intent to kill. The bill also eliminates two other liability doctrines: criminal responsibility for conduct of another (accomplice liability) and criminal responsibility for facilitation of a felony.

Why is this important

These changes would significantly narrow when individuals can be prosecuted for murder in circumstances where they didn't directly cause or intend a death. This affects how Tennessee prosecutes gang violence, armed robbery that results in deaths, and other felony scenarios. The changes would fundamentally alter criminal accountability structures that have existed for decades.

Potential points of contention

  • Reduced accountability for accomplices: Removing accomplice liability and felony murder rules could mean individuals actively participating in dangerous crimes (like armed robbery) wouldn't face murder charges if someone dies, potentially reducing deterrence and victim justice
  • Inconsistent liability: Someone could be convicted of armed robbery that results in a death but face significantly lesser penalties than someone who directly kills during the same crime, raising fairness questions
  • Public safety concerns: Law enforcement and prosecutors argue these doctrines are essential tools for prosecuting organized crime, gang violence, and crimes where responsibility is shared among multiple actors
  • Facilitation clause removal: Eliminating criminal responsibility for facilitating felonies could create gaps where people who knowingly enable serious crimes face no criminal liability

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.