WeVote
Log In

Bill

WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 961

HB 961 — Criminal Intent Sentence Enhancement (The Hate Crimes Prevention Act)

Status: Passed 1st Reading (filed 11/12/2024; referred 03/06/2025 to Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs)
Primary sponsor: Rep. Charles Smith
Scope/Subjects: Courts; Crimes; Criminal Procedure; Discrimination; Minorities; Gender; Sentencing

Purpose / Intent

The bill creates a statutory sentence enhancement when a felony is committed “because of” a victim’s protected characteristic. It is presented as “The Hate Crimes Prevention Act” and is intended to increase penalties for bias-motivated felony conduct and to align sentencing law with the recognition of victim characteristics as an aggravating factor.

Key provisions

  • New statutory section (§ 15A‑1340.16H):
    • If a defendant is convicted of a felony and the offense is found to have been committed because of the victim’s race, ethnicity, color, religion, nationality, country of origin, or gender, the defendant “shall be sentenced at a felony class level one class higher than the principal felony.”
    • An indictment or information charging the felony must allege the facts that qualify the offense for the enhancement (one pleading is sufficient for multiple felonies tried together).
    • The State must prove the enhancement element beyond a reasonable doubt at the same trial as the underlying felony, unless the defendant pleas guilty or no contest to that issue. If the defendant pleads guilty or no contest to the felony but contests the bias enhancement, the enhancement issue must be decided by a jury.
  • Conforming amendment:
    • The aggravating factor list in G.S. 15A‑1340.16(d)(17) is revised to explicitly include “or gender” among characteristics that may constitute an aggravating circumstance at sentencing.
  • Effective date (as presented in the bill text): The act becomes effective December 1, 2025, and applies to offenses committed on or after that date.

Who is affected

  • Defendants convicted of felonies found to be bias-motivated — they face an elevated felony class and correspondingly greater potential penalties.
  • Victims who fall within the enumerated characteristics (race, ethnicity, color, religion, nationality, country of origin, gender) — the law recognizes bias-motivation as increasing the severity of punishment.
  • Prosecutors and courts — prosecutors must allege bias-enhancement facts in charging documents and prove them beyond a reasonable doubt; courts will need to adjudicate enhancement allegations (potentially requiring jury findings).
  • Sentencing system — more cases may result in higher-class felony sentencing and may affect plea negotiations, charging decisions, and sentencing outcomes.

Procedural / evidentiary aspects

  • Allegation requirement: charging documents must include facts supporting the enhancement.
  • Burden of proof: State must prove bias-motivation beyond a reasonable doubt in the same trial (or via separate jury determination if the defendant admits the felony but disputes the enhancement).
  • The enhancement is automatic upon a finding that the offense was committed “because of” a listed characteristic and results in moving the convicted felony up one class for sentencing purposes.

Notable limitations / scope notes

  • The bill lists specific protected characteristics; it does not expressly enumerate sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability (it does include “gender”). The statute’s scope is therefore defined by the listed terms.
  • The text increases the felony class by one level rather than imposing mandatory fixed-term add-ons; the practical sentence increase depends on the class structure and applicable sentencing ranges.

This summary reflects the bill text establishing the bias‑motivated felony enhancement and the procedural rules for alleging and proving it.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.