WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 4662

Crime victims: notices; notification to crime victims utilizing other communication technology under the crime victim communication modernization act; provide for. Amends 1985 PA 87 (MCL 780.751 - 780.834) by adding sec. 3a. TIE BAR WITH: HB 4661'25

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Erin Byrnes and 18 co-sponsors

Authors may deliver victim notices via other communication technology (electronic/modern methods) if standards, consent, and opt-out rules are met and the entity participates in th

bill electronically reproduced 06/17/2025
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 4662

Summary — HB 4662 (2025)

Status: House introduced (3/12/2025); bill text electronically reproduced 6/17/2025.
Subject: Amend William Van Regenmorter Crime Victim’s Rights Act (1985 PA 87; MCL 780.751–780.834) by adding section 3a. Tie-bar: bill does not take effect unless companion legislation (SB ___ or HB 4661 of the 103rd Legislature) is enacted.

Purpose / Intent

To authorize, subject to conditions, courts and certain government agencies to deliver statutorily required victim notices by “other communication technology” (e.g., electronic or modernized communications) under a new framework established by the Crime Victim Communication Modernization Act, with safeguards for standards, consent, and opt-outs.

Key provisions

  • Adds new section 3a to the Crime Victim’s Rights Act permitting a court, the Department of Corrections (DOC), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), law enforcement agencies, county sheriffs, and prosecuting attorneys to provide a “qualifying notice” to victims via other communication technology.
  • Use of other communication technology is allowed only if the entity:
    • Participates in the grant program created by the Crime Victim Communication Modernization Act; and
    • Complies with the standards required by the designated “office” under that Act.
  • The office must ensure the standards actually facilitate the required modernized communications and notifications before entities may use the technology.
  • Entities may not use other communication technology for a victim who has submitted an opt-out indicating they do not want such notices.
  • If a victim gives consent and provides contact information (telephone number, email address, or other required info), a written qualifying notice may be sent by other communication technology and is treated as provided upon transmission.
  • Defines “qualifying notice” for this section as any required notice that (a) is not required to be mailed and (b) does not require a specific document, record, or form to accompany it.
  • References “office” as defined in section 3 of the Crime Victim Communication Modernization Act.

Who is affected

  • Crime victims (receipt and mode of notice; opt-in/opt-out rights)
  • State and local courts, DOC, DHHS, law enforcement agencies, county sheriffs, and prosecuting attorneys (may adopt new delivery methods if program participation and standards are met)
  • The administrative “office” established under the Crime Victim Communication Modernization Act (responsible for standards and grant program oversight)

Procedural / timeline aspects

  • Effective 90 days after enactment.
  • Enacting section conditions the bill’s effectiveness on enactment of the companion bill (SB ___ or HB 4661).

Practical implications (neutral)

  • Enables modernization of victim notifications (potentially faster, electronic delivery) where agencies participate in the modernization grant program and follow required standards.
  • Preserves victim choice through an opt-out mechanism and requires written consent for electronic delivery of certain written notices.
  • Implementation depends on the corresponding Crime Victim Communication Modernization Act, grant participation, and the office’s standards-setting.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.