WeVote

Bill

Bill

SB 1065

SS/SCS/SB 1065 - The act modifies and creates new provisions relating to utility facility relocation. The State Road Fund shall be used for reimbursing for certain utility relocation costs, as described in the act. The Department of Transportation shall reimburse non-rate-regulated providers for any labor costs associated with facility relocation that are required due to road maintenance, construction, or other right-of-way work activity. Notification requirements by the Department and response requirements by the non-rate-regulated provider are described in the act. The Department of Transportation shall reimburse a non-rate-regulated provider for the provider's labor costs for the facility relocation not to exceed specific amounts described in the act. This provision shall expire on July 1, 2031. A non-rate-regulated provider shall provide invoices to the Department for the provider's labor costs for the fiscal year in which such work occurs. Payment of the invoices is described in the act. If a provider's total labor costs exceed the specified amounts under the act, such payments shall be prorated. The Department shall be required to publicly disclose on an annual basis no later than July 31st a list of facility reimbursement invoices received, as described in the act. The act shall not require the Department to reimburse a non-rate-regulated provider for the removal or relocation of facilities placed in the public right-of-way in violation of state law or local permitting requirements. Under the act, subject to certain exceptions, the removal and relocation of utility facilities as a result of construction projects required by the Highways and Transportation Commission shall be made at the expense of the owners unless otherwise provided by the Commission. Currently, if the owner fails to relocate the utility facilities, the cost of relocating the utility facilities shall be collected from the owner. Under the act, the cost of relocating the utility facilities shall be the responsibility of the Commission or the owner. JULIA SHEVELEVA

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Ben Brown

Missouri bill establishing procedures and requirements for utility facility relocation, affecting development projects, cost responsibilities, and infrastructure coordination statewide.

Informal Calendar S Bills for Perfection
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 1065

Legislative bill overview

SB 1065 establishes new provisions governing how utility companies must handle the relocation of their facilities in Missouri. The bill addresses the processes, responsibilities, and potentially cost-sharing arrangements when utilities need to move infrastructure like electric lines, gas pipes, or telecommunications equipment. The specific details of these provisions are not fully available from the legislative record provided.

Why is this important

Utility relocation directly affects infrastructure development, property rights, and who bears the financial burden when public or private projects require utilities to move. These decisions impact construction timelines and costs for development projects, utility rates for consumers, and the efficiency of infrastructure planning across the state. Clear relocation standards can prevent disputes and clarify expectations for all parties involved.

Potential points of contention

  • Cost allocation: Whether developers, property owners, or utility companies should bear relocation expenses remains a common source of conflict in such legislation
  • Timeline and process requirements: Mandating specific procedures could delay projects or create compliance burdens depending on how stringent the requirements are
  • Applicability scope: Questions about which types of utilities and projects are covered, and whether the rules apply uniformly or have exceptions for certain circumstances

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.