WeVote

Bill

Bill

HF 2955

County-administered rural medical assistance program established; payment, coverage, and eligibility requirements for the CARMA program established; and commissioner of human services directed to seek federal waivers.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Jeff Backer and 4 co-sponsors

CARMA creates a county-administered rural medical program as an alternative to PMAP, with local control, full-risk capitation, and future expansion to include health-related social

Introduction and first reading, referred to Health Finance and Policy
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 2955

HF2955 Summary (Minnesota 2025-2026)

Overview
- Bill: HF 2955
- Session/Jurisdiction: Minnesota, 2025-2026
- Topic: Establishes a county-administered rural medical assistance program (CARMA) as an alternative to PMAP and related programs, with details on governance, enrollment, payments, benefits, data integration, and federal waivers
- Status: Introduced April 2025; referred to Health Finance and Policy

Purpose and intent
- Create CARMA: A county-owned and county-administered alternative to state medical assistance and related programs for rural areas.
- Improve integration: Align health care with public health and social services to address health-related social needs (HRSN) in rural communities.
- Increase local control and accountability: Leverage county input on networks, procurement, and program performance while ensuring compliance with broader state and federal requirements.
- Seek federal waivers: Directs the commissioner of human services to apply for federal waivers necessary to implement CARMA.

Key provisions and changes

1) CARMA establishment and structure (Sec. 2; new statute 256B.695)
- Definitions:
- CARMA: County-administered rural medical assistance program
- Eligible individual: Residents in counties administering CARMA who are eligible for medical assistance, MinnesotaCare, MSHO, MSC+, or SNBC
- Enrollee: CARMA participant
- PMAP: Prepaid Medical Assistance Program
- Rural county: Based on rural area definitions in federal regulation
- Program purpose (Subd. 2)
- Provide a county-owned/administrated alternative to PMAP
- Integrate health care, public health, and social services
- Acknowledge smaller enrollments and local provider networks in rural areas
- Promote accountability for health outcomes, equity, customer service, outreach, and cost
- County participation (Subd. 3)
- Counties or groups of counties may administer CARMA for eligible individuals as an alternative to PMAP, MinnesotaCare, MSHO, MSC+, SNBC
- Counties administering CARMA are exempt from the standard procurement process under 256B.69
- Oversight and procurement (Subd. 4)
- CARMA governed by existing sections (256B.69, 256B.692) unless stated otherwise
- DHS must develop a procurement process for county-based plans to apply to offer CARMA
- Applications reviewed for regulatory compliance and ability to meet program goals
- Enrollment and elections (Subd. 5)
- Automatic enrollment of eligible individuals into CARMA, with option to decline
- Annual election period; changes allowed within year for certain circumstances
- If other plans are required by federal law, or counties terminate contracts for cause, DHS may offer alternative/ replacement plans
- If counties must offer a second plan, and individuals don’t select, they may be automatically enrolled in CARMA
- Second plan options may be offered for Medicare dual-eligibles where necessary
- This subdivision supersedes some existing CARMA-related sections
- Benefits and services (Subd. 6)
- CARMA-covered benefits must include all requirements of medical assistance under 256B.0625
- HRSN benefits may be included starting January 1, 2030, addressing housing, food, transportation, utilities, interpersonal safety
- Enrollees may be reimbursed for out-of-pocket costs for HRSN services from nontraditional providers (not for providers already eligible to enroll)
- Payment and financing (Subd. 7)
- A DHS-county collaboration must establish a payment mechanism with:
- Contract-based terms including adjustable rates
- Full-risk monthly capitation for CARMA services and administration
- Risk corridors (minimum loss ratio, total cost of care, or other metrics)
- Settle-up process tied to risk corridors; potential reinvestment of savings after at least year 3
- Collaborative rate-setting considering CARMA, regional, and DHS FFS experience
- Exemption from certain DHS payment provisions for at least three years post-CARMA implementation
- Payments for CARMA benefits must not exceed prior PA payments; HRSN payments in addition to benefits payments
- Quality measures (Subd. 8)
- Develop CARMA quality measures aligned with 256B.69 and 256B.692
- Focus areas: Enrollee experience/outcomes, population health, health equity, and value of spending
- Create a county-specific quality improvement model, defined before contracts with counties
- Data, systems, and integration (Subd. 9)
- Improve eligibility reviews, enrollment navigation, and transitions to other programs
- Develop a universal public assistance application form
- Remove barriers to interagency collaboration and enhance interoperability
- Streamline data exchange and reduce manual processes
- Maintain an updated electronic inventory of community resources with closed-loop referrals

2) Administrative and timing provisions
- Effective date: Provisions in Sec. 2 and 4 are effective January 1, 2027
- Sec. 3: Federal waivers
- The commissioner must seek all federal waivers and authorities needed to implement CARMA
- Any parts not requiring federal approval have state-law effective dates; revisor notified when waivers are obtained
- Relationship to existing programs
- CARMA serves as an alternative to PMAP and related programs for participating counties
- County-based purchasing provisions and contract management are adjusted to accommodate CARMA

Potential impact and considerations

  • Access and convenience for rural residents: CARMA aims to tailor coverage to rural needs, potentially improving access to care and coordination with social services.
  • Local control: Counties gain procurement influence, network design, and performance oversight for CARMA, potentially increasing responsiveness to local needs.
  • Costs and risk management: Full-risk capitation and risk corridors shift financial risk to county entities, with mechanisms to reinvest savings—requiring careful financial governance.
  • HRSN expansion: Introducing coverage for nonclinical supports (housing, food, transportation, utilities, safety) starting in 2030 could address social determinants of health in rural areas.
  • Data and interoperability: Emphasis on universal applications and data sharing may improve program navigation but requires robust IT investments and privacy safeguards.
  • Federal waivers: Success depends on obtaining necessary waivers; timeline and scope hinge on federal approvals.

Effective date note
- While core CARMA provisions are slated to take effect January 1, 2027, some adjustments could occur earlier if related federal approvals or state actions are completed.

End of summary.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.