WeVote

Bill

Bill

SB 1124

Consumer Protection - As introduced, requires a company offering to sell or install a solar energy system to provide written proof that the utility serving the area where the system is to be installed has a net metering program or otherwise offers net metering credits to an owner or user of a system before the company enters into an agreement to sell or install the system; designates a violation as an unfair or deceptive act or practice pursuant to the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act of 1977. - Amends TCA Title 4; Title 6; Title 7; Title 9; Title 13; Title 47; Title 65 and Title 66.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Steve Southerland

Bill requires solar companies to verify net metering availability before selling systems, protecting consumers from unsuitable installations and treating violations as deceptive trade practices.

Passed on Second Consideration, refer to Senate Commerce and Labor Committee
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 1124

Legislative bill overview

SB 1124 requires solar energy companies to provide written proof that a utility offers net metering or net metering credits before signing a contract with customers. Violations are classified as unfair or deceptive trade practices under Tennessee's Consumer Protection Act, making them subject to enforcement and penalties.

Why is this important

Net metering is critical to solar economics—it allows customers to earn credits for excess electricity their systems generate back to the grid. Without net metering, residential solar becomes significantly less financially attractive. This bill prevents companies from selling systems in areas where customers cannot actually benefit from them, addressing a consumer protection gap.

Potential points of contention

  • Solar industry burden: Companies argue this adds compliance costs and administrative complexity, potentially slowing market growth and delaying installations while verification occurs
  • Utility variations: Net metering programs vary significantly by utility and can change; defining what constitutes adequate "proof" and handling program changes after sale could create disputes
  • Consumer autonomy: Some argue customers should have the right to make informed decisions themselves rather than having the state restrict their purchasing options based on utility programs

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.