WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 630

Consumer Protection - As introduced, authorizes a consumer to designate an authorized agent who may opt the consumer out of the processing of the consumer’s personal data; requires a controller to comply with an opt-out request from an authorized agent if certain conditions are met. - Amends TCA Title 47, Chapter 18.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by John Clemmons

Allows Tennessee consumers to designate agents to opt out of personal data processing on their behalf, expanding privacy rights for those unable to manage requests independently.

Taken off notice for cal in s/c Banking and Consumer Affairs Subcommittee of Commerce Committee
#consumerprotection
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 630

Legislative bill overview

HB 630 allows Tennessee consumers to designate an authorized agent to opt them out of personal data processing on their behalf. The bill requires data controllers to honor opt-out requests submitted by these agents if specific conditions are satisfied, amending Tennessee's consumer data protection law (TCA Title 47, Chapter 18).

Why is this important

This bill addresses practical barriers to data privacy by allowing consumers—particularly those with disabilities, elderly individuals, or those managing multiple accounts—to delegate privacy decisions to trusted representatives. It could significantly expand effective use of existing data privacy rights that many consumers currently cannot exercise independently.

Potential points of contention

  • Agent verification burden: Unclear what "certain conditions" must be met for agent authorization; overly strict verification could create administrative barriers while loose standards could enable unauthorized opt-outs
  • Scope of agent authority: Bill doesn't specify whether agents can access consumer data, delete accounts, or only submit opt-out requests, raising potential fraud and identity theft concerns
  • Business compliance costs: Data controllers may argue compliance with agent requests requires new infrastructure and systems, particularly for smaller companies
  • Definitional gaps: The bill references amendments to Chapter 18 but existing Tennessee data privacy law is limited compared to other states, potentially creating confusion about which processing activities are covered

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.