WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HCR 37

Condemns abuses by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, affirms the constitutional and human rights of all people within the United States, and recognizes the essential social and economic contributions of migrants to the nation

2026 Regular Session Introduced by LaKeySha Bosley and 2 co-sponsors

Missouri concurrent resolution condemning ICE enforcement practices and affirming migrants' constitutional rights and economic value without establishing binding enforcement mechanisms.

Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
#federal-staterelations #immigration
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HCR 37

Legislative bill overview

HCR 37 is a concurrent resolution condemning alleged abuses by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), reaffirming constitutional protections for all people in the United States regardless of immigration status, and formally acknowledging migrants' contributions to the economy and society. As a concurrent resolution, it expresses legislative sentiment rather than creating binding law or enforcement mechanisms.

Why is this important

Immigration enforcement and the treatment of migrants are contentious policy areas with significant real-world consequences for thousands of individuals and families. This resolution signals Missouri's legislative stance on federal immigration enforcement practices and could influence public discourse, local policy priorities, or how state resources are allocated regarding immigration matters. It also reflects broader national debates about balancing border security with humanitarian concerns and workers' rights.

Potential points of contention

  • Definition and evidence of "abuses": Opponents may argue the resolution lacks specificity about which ICE practices constitute abuses, while supporters contend well-documented cases of family separations and detention conditions justify the broad language
  • Federal vs. state authority: Questions about whether a state legislature should condemn federal immigration enforcement or if this overreaches into federal jurisdiction and immigration policy
  • Economic impact claims: Disagreement over the extent and measurability of migrants' "essential social and economic contributions" and whether certain communities bear disproportionate costs of immigration versus benefits

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.