WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HRES 1436

Condemning Omar Suleiman for celebrating the death of Senator Lindsey Graham and acknowledging that House Democrats invited him to serve as the Guest Chaplain of the U.S. House of Representatives in 2019.

119th Congress Introduced by Jodey Arrington and 21 co-sponsors

Condemns Omar Suleiman for allegedly celebrating Lindsey Graham’s death and asserts Democrats invited him to be Guest Chaplain in 2019, shaping the official record.

Submitted in House
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HRES 1436

Summary of HRES 1436 (106th Congress? 119th Session context)

Note: The bill as described appears to be a resolution in the U.S. House of Representatives condemning Omar Suleiman for celebrating the death of Senator Lindsey Graham and asserting that House Democrats invited him to serve as the Guest Chaplain in 2019. The provided action history shows it was referred to the House Committee on House Administration and submitted in the House on 2026-07-15, with a list of co-sponsors. The title, purpose, and provisions reflect a condemnation resolution with assertions about invitations extended in 2019. The following summary presents the observable elements as a legislative text, focusing on purpose, provisions, affected parties, and procedural timeline.

Purpose and intent

  • The primary objective is to condemn Omar Suleiman for allegedly celebrating the death of Senator Lindsey Graham.
  • The resolution also asserts that House Democrats invited Omar Suleiman to serve as the Guest Chaplain of the U.S. House of Representatives in 2019, framing this as a factual assertion for the record.

Key provisions and changes (substantive content)

  • Unambiguous condemnation: The bill declares Omar Suleiman's actions—specifically the alleged celebration of Senator Lindsey Graham’s death—as disqualifying or condemnable behavior.
  • Congressional record assertion: The resolution asserts a past invitation by House Democrats for Suleiman to serve as Guest Chaplain in 2019, intended to document and publicize perceived controversial associations or actions.
  • Formal expression of sentiment: As a House resolution, it communicates the chamber’s stance and posture regarding Suleiman and related parliamentary history, rather than creating new statutory or regulatory powers.

Note: As a concurrent or simple resolution, it does not modify law or create new federal programs; its impact is primarily political and symbolic, shaping the official record and the narrative surrounding the individuals named.

Who or what would be affected

  • Omar Suleiman: The resolution targets his actions and questions his public associations, contributing to a formal rebuke within the legislative record.
  • Lindsey Graham: The subject of condemnation; the resolution reflects a stance related to his death.
  • House Democrats (historical context): The bill cites an alleged invitation in 2019, which would relate to past procedural and personnel arrangements in the House, though the resolution itself does not alter those historical facts but records them as asserted.
  • House of Representatives: The resolution influences the official record, signaling the chamber's viewpoint on the cited events and figures.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Action history:
    • 2026-07-15: Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
    • 2026-07-15: Submitted in House.
  • Status: As of the provided information, the bill has been referred to committee and has a broad list of co-sponsors, indicating potential for further legislative action, debate, or amendments within the committee and chamber.
  • Committee jurisdiction: House Administration, which handles congressional operations, employee and official conduct, and related procedural matters, suggesting the resolution may address internal congressional protocol and historical records.

Co-sponsors

  • A broad list of Republican members, including but not limited to: Michael Cloud, Keith Self, Nathaniel Moran, Brandon Gill, Roger Williams, John Carter, Randy Fine, Wesley Hunt, Jake Ellzey, Dan Crenshaw, Michael McCaul, Jodey Arrington, Morgan Luttrell, Beth Van Duyne, August Pfluger, Claudia Tenney, Erin Houchin, Troy Nehls, Ronny Jackson, Pat Fallon, Brian Babin, Chip Roy, among others.

Potential impact and considerations

  • The resolution serves a primarily symbolic and political function, signaling the House’s stance on the named individual and the alleged 2019 guest chaplain invitation.
  • It could influence public perception and media framing of the involved figures and events.
  • As a non-binding resolution, it does not change law or allocate funding; its enforceability is limited to the official congressional record and rhetorical posture.
  • If enacted, it would be part of the official House record and could be cited in political or public discourse, but would not alter the duties or powers of Congress beyond its symbolic intent.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to a specific audience (e.g., general public, policy analysts, or journalists) or compare it with similar past resolutions for context.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.