WeVote
Log In

Bill

WB

Bill

HRES 1035

Condemning Federal workforce reductions that undermine preparedness, response, and recovery, and expressing concern regarding proposed future staffing cuts to the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

119th Congress Introduced by Wesley Bell and 35 co-sponsors

House resolution condemns federal workforce cuts at FEMA and similar agencies, expressing concern that staffing reductions compromise disaster preparedness and emergency response capabilities.

Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HRES 1035

Legislative bill overview

HRES 1035 is a congressional resolution condemning reductions in federal workforce staffing, particularly at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The resolution expresses concern about both current layoffs and proposed future staffing cuts that sponsors argue would compromise emergency preparedness, response capabilities, and disaster recovery efforts.

Why is this important

FEMA's operational capacity directly affects disaster response times and recovery resources available to states and communities during hurricanes, floods, wildfires, and other emergencies. Staffing levels impact whether the agency can adequately pre-position resources, coordinate with state/local partners, and manage recovery operations—consequences that became visible during recent major disaster seasons.

Potential points of contention

  • Definition of "undermine": Republicans may argue that workforce optimization improves efficiency without degrading capabilities, while Democrats contend specific cuts exceed reasonable efficiency targets
  • Budgetary context: The resolution doesn't specify preferred staffing levels or funding amounts, making it unclear whether sponsors support increased appropriations or opposing any reductions
  • Emergency response data: Disagreement likely exists over whether current FEMA performance metrics show degradation from recent staffing actions or whether reductions occurred without measurable impact
  • Political timing: The resolution targets executive branch decisions that may reflect different philosophical views about government size and spending

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.