Common interest developments: cooling systems.
California CIDs cannot ban or charge fees for residents installing or using cooling systems in their own units; restrictions are void and enforcement penalties apply.
California CIDs cannot ban or charge fees for residents installing or using cooling systems in their own units; restrictions are void and enforcement penalties apply.
AB 1684 aims to ensure that residents of common interest developments (CIDs) can install, upgrade, or use cooling systems in their own separate interests without being prohibited or unduly burdened by governing documents, architectural guidelines, or deeds. The bill expands protections currently applicable to mobilehome parks and applies them to typical CIDs (condominiums, cooperatives, subdivisions) under the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act.
Key goals:
- Remove prohibitions or restrictions on cooling systems in CID governing documents and related instruments.
- Prohibit associations from imposing fees, restrictions, or requirements related to cooling systems, with limited exceptions.
- Provide remedies and damages for violations by associations.
New sections 4737 and 4738 (Civil Code) establish that:
Scope of "Cooling System"
The term "cooling system" is defined broadly to include, but not be limited to:
Cooling systems must meet all applicable health and safety standards and building code requirements.
Rights of Members Within Their Separate Interest
Associations may not prohibit or restrict a member from installing, upgrading, replacing, or using a cooling system in their separate interest.
Prohibited association actions include:
Exceptions:
Shared/Public Areas and Damages
The bill preserves the ability of an association to require a member to repair damages to common or exclusive-use areas caused by the cooling system installation/operation/removal if such damages occur.
Remedies and Penalties
If an association willfully violates these provisions, it is liable to the member for actual damages.
Civil penalty to the member up to $2,000.
A prevailing member in enforcement actions is entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees and court costs.
Affected Parties:
Affected Instruments:
If you’d like, I can provide a side-by-side comparison with current Davis-Stirling provisions or draft a plain-language FAQ for residents and CID boards.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.