Commissioner of natural resources prohibited from limiting number of native rough fish taken in one day or number possessed.
Prohibits the DNR from setting or enforcing daily take or possession limits for native rough fish.
Prohibits the DNR from setting or enforcing daily take or possession limits for native rough fish.
Commissioner of Natural Resources prohibited from limiting number of native rough fish taken in one day or number possessed.
HF 4594 seeks to constrain the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) from setting or enforcing limits on:
- The number of native rough fish that a individual may take in a single day, and
- The number of native rough fish that a person may possess.
The bill appears to promote greater access or fewer regulatory constraints on harvesting native rough fish, by restricting the DNR’s authority to impose daily take limits and possession limits specific to native rough fish.
Given the bill’s title, the following is the core change proposed:
- Prohibition on DNR action that would limit harvest or possession of native rough fish in terms of daily take limits or possession limits.
- The language would prevent the DNR from establishing, adjusting, or enforcing any caps on (a) the number of native rough fish that may be taken in one day, and (b) the number of native rough fish that may be possessed by an angler or other harvest participant.
What this does not explicitly address (in the absence of the full text):
- It does not specify alternative management tools (e.g., bag limits on other species, seasonal restrictions, size limits) that would continue to apply.
- It does not indicate whether non-native or invasive species rules would be affected, or whether other catch-and-release or harvest rules remain unchanged.
- It does not specify enforcement mechanisms, penalties, or exemptions (if any) related to this prohibition.
No fiscal note or timeline for committee action is provided in the summary provided. If enacted, the bill would take effect upon any specified effective date in the final enacted text (not provided here).
This summary is based on the bill’s title and noted action history. Access to the full text would allow a precise articulation of the exact language, any exceptions, definitions (e.g., what constitutes “native rough fish”), and any transitional provisions.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.