WeVote

Bill

Bill

HR 673

COMMENDS-DAVID J. SILVERMAN

104th Regular Session Introduced by Dee Avelar and 4 co-sponsors

HR 673 is a ceremonial resolution honoring David J. Silverman; it recognizes his achievements without creating law or policy.

Resolution Adopted
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 673

Bill Summary – HR 673 (104th Illinois General Assembly)

Purpose and intent

  • HR 673 is a resolution that formally commends an individual named David J. Silverman. The bill’s primary aim is honorary recognition rather than creating new law or directing government policy.
  • The sponsors listed for the measure include a majority sponsor and several co-sponsors: Harry Benton, Dee Avelar, Larry Walsh, Anthony DeLuca, and Natalie Manley. The presence of multiple co-sponsors signals broad institutional support for the commendation.

Key provisions and changes

  • The bill does not propose legislative or regulatory changes, funding programs, or new duties for state agencies.
  • The central provision is a resolution expressing commendation, typically outlining the reasons for honoring the individual (e.g., achievements, service, community impact). The exact language would specify the nature of David J. Silverman’s contributions and the rationale for recognition.
  • Resolution language generally includes:
    • A formal statement acknowledging the honor.
    • A brief summary of the individual’s accomplishments or service.
    • A note of appreciation on behalf of the legislators or the state.

Who or what would be affected

  • The primary beneficiaries are David J. Silverman and, more broadly, the community or constituency acknowledging his achievements.
  • The resolution affects the legislative record and public recognition, serving as an official ceremonial acknowledgment rather than direct policy impact.
  • There is no anticipated impact on state budgets, regulatory regimes, or existing programs.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • As a House Resolution (HR), the bill follows standard legislative formalities for non-binding resolutions.
  • Typical process includes:
    • Introduction and assignment to committee.
    • Potential committee consideration or a straightforward floor vote, depending on the chamber’s procedures.
    • Passage by the House and, if applicable, transmission to the Senate for similar action (though HRs are often culminated within the House unless cross-chamber action is specified).
  • No specific dates, fiscal implications, or sunset provisions are indicated in the summary information provided.

Notable considerations

  • The bill is ceremonial in nature; it does not create new laws or fiscal obligations.
  • The value of such resolutions lies in public recognition and the potential to highlight community leadership or service.
  • If you seek deeper context, the bill’s exact text would list the achievements of David J. Silverman and the occasion for commendation.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to include the precise language from the bill’s text or add contextual information about the individual’s contributions, once the official bill text is available.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.