WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 57

Civil procedure: civil actions; lawsuits for exercising rights to free expression; provide protections against. Creates new act.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Stephanie Chang and 2 co-sponsors

SB 57 creates legal protections shielding individuals from civil lawsuits filed in retaliation for exercising free speech and expression rights.

REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON CIVIL RIGHTS, JUDICIARY, AND PUBLIC SAFETY
#civilprocedure:civilactions
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 57

Legislative bill overview

SB 57 creates a new statutory framework to provide legal protections for individuals engaged in free expression activities, shielding them from certain civil lawsuits. The bill establishes defenses or immunities related to exercising First Amendment rights in civil litigation contexts. The exact scope and mechanisms are not detailed in the introduction, requiring review of the full bill text.

Why is this important

Civil lawsuits can function as a form of speech suppression, even when they ultimately fail—a phenomenon known as Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs). This bill would protect speakers from costly litigation designed to intimidate or silence them. The protection could affect journalists, activists, public commenters, and ordinary citizens engaged in civic participation.

Potential points of contention

  • Definition clarity: What specific free expression activities qualify for protection? Vagueness could either underprotect speakers or create loopholes.
  • Balance with legitimate claims: Critics may argue the bill could shield defendants from legitimate defamation, harassment, or other civil claims by falsely labeling them speech-related.
  • Business and organizational impact: Companies may oppose protections if they limit ability to sue for actual damages from statements harming their interests or reputation.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.