WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 295

Civil Actions - Immunity - Disclosure of Allegations of Sexually Assaultive Behavior (Stop Silencing Survivors Act)

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Dawn Gile and 2 co-sponsors

Maryland bill eliminates legal immunity for disclosing sexual assault allegations, enabling survivors to speak publicly despite confidentiality agreements while raising defamation liability concerns.

Hearing 2/03 at 2:00 p.m.
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 295

Legislative bill overview

SB 295 modifies Maryland law to limit immunity protections that shield individuals and organizations from liability when disclosing allegations of sexually assaultive behavior. The bill aims to enable survivors to speak publicly about sexual assault allegations without fear of legal retaliation, particularly in cases where non-disclosure agreements or confidentiality clauses might otherwise silence them.

Why is this important

Sexual assault survivors often face legal barriers—including settlement agreements with confidentiality provisions—that prevent them from publicly disclosing their allegations. This bill addresses a real tension between survivors' ability to warn others and legal protections that can inadvertently enable repeat offenders to operate without public knowledge. The legislation affects both individual civil liability and organizational accountability in handling assault allegations.

Potential points of contention

  • Scope of immunity removal: How broadly will immunity be eliminated? Overly broad definitions could expose organizations and individuals to frivolous lawsuits, while narrow definitions may not adequately protect survivors seeking to share their experiences.
  • Balancing free speech with defamation concerns: The bill must navigate between protecting survivors from liability and protecting accused individuals from false or unsubstantiated claims made without evidence, raising due process questions.
  • Impact on settlement agreements: Survivors may lose leverage in negotiating settlements if organizations know they cannot enforce confidentiality provisions, potentially reducing compensation offers or forcing cases to trial.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.