WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 4040

CHARTER SCH-CONTRACT TRANSFER

104th Regular Session Introduced by Li Arellano and 3 co-sponsors

The bill transfers authorization and governance of certain state-chartered non-Article 34 charters to local districts by July 1, 2027, with 7-year terms under local control.

Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 4040

Summary of SB4040 (104th General Assembly, Illinois)

Title

Charter School Contract Transfer

Purpose and intent

SB4040 proposes transferring the authorization and related governance responsibilities for certain State Board of Education–authorized charter schools to local school boards. The transfer would take effect July 1, 2027 for charter schools located outside the geographic area of a district organized under Article 34 (i.e., outside the local district’s jurisdiction). The bill sets a 7-year term for charter contracts under local control and establishes a framework for oversight, governance, and accountability under the local boards, including a joint charter management team when a charter draws from multiple districts.

Key provisions and changes

  • Transfer of authority (July 1, 2027):

    • Charter schools authorized by the State Board and located outside the geographical area of a city with a district organized under Article 34 will have their authorization and all associated authorizer powers, duties, contracts, and pending business transferred to the local school board(s) for each district from which the charter draws enrollment.
    • Local boards would assume all responsibilities currently held by the State Board as the authorizer.

  • Contract terms:

    • All charter contract terms remain in full force unless amended by mutual agreement.
    • The initial term under local control would be 7 years beginning July 1, 2027.

  • Multidistrict charters:

    • If a State-authorized charter enrolls students from more than one district, the boards of all districts involved must establish a Joint Charter Management Team, with at least one administrator from each district.
    • The Joint Charter Management Team must develop and execute a Charter Oversight Plan, submitted to the State Board as part of the charter certification process.
    • The plan outlines roles and responsibilities of each local board and governs authorizer powers and duties (as outlined in relevant statute).

  • Oversight and accountability:

    • A single set of goals, pupil performance standards, and content standards may apply for multi-district charters (to ensure coherence in accountability).

  • Judicial review:

    • Final decisions by a local school board to deny, revoke, or not renew a charter are subject to judicial review under the Administrative Review Law.

  • Elimination of prior State Board appeal constraints:

    • The bill removes language granting the State Board authority to reverse a local board’s revocation or nonrenewal if the charter is compliant and in students’ best interests and to condition appeals on accepting funding levels below what was proposed. The revised framework emphasizes local decision-making, with judicial review available for final local board decisions.

  • Funding and payments (transition-related):

    • If transfer occurs, the State Board would become the overseeing body for funding during the transition, including backing out funds to local districts if applicable. For charters under State Board authority, the State Board would maintain responsibilities for funding and related reporting.
    • The bill preserves required reporting, attendance, and enrollment data to ensure proper funding and accountability during and after the transition.

  • Article references and transition mechanics:

    • The proposal changes sections 27A-7.5 and 27A-9 of the School Code, including transition mechanics, oversight requirements, and the authority shift.
    • Effective date: The act takes effect upon becoming law.

Who is affected

  • Charter schools currently authorized by the State Board of Education that are located outside the geographic area of a district organized under Article 34.
  • Local school districts/districts from which charter enrollment is drawn (potentially multiple districts in the case of multi-district charters).
  • State Board of Education (loss of authorizing authority for affected charters; transition to local boards).
  • Charter management teams (in multi-district scenarios, to coordinate oversight among district administrations).

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Effective date: Upon becoming law.
  • Implementation date for transfer: July 1, 2027.
  • Transition process: Local boards will assume authorizer duties, contracts, and pending business from the State Board; charter terms will continue with a 7-year term under local control; joint management teams for multi-district charters will be formed as needed and submitted oversight plans to the State Board.

Notes

  • The bill’s changes are focused on governance, accountability, and administrative structure, with emphasis on local control for certain charters and a defined transition plan to ensure continuity of charters during the shift.
  • Final decisions by local boards remain subject to judicial review under the Administrative Review Law.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.