WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SF 4666

Certain mandatory privacy notices to be titled as surveillance notices requirement provision

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Susan Pha

The bill requires certain privacy notices to be labeled and framed as “surveillance notices” to improve visibility and understanding of data monitoring.

Referred to Commerce and Consumer Protection
#commerceandcommercedepartment #consumerprotection #datapracticesandprivacy
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 4666

Summary of SF 4666 (Minnesota, 2025-2026 Session)

Title

Certain mandatory privacy notices to be titled as surveillance notices requirement provision

Purpose and intent

SF 4666 introduces a mandate that certain mandatory privacy notices must be titled and framed as “surveillance notices.” The bill appears to aim at clarifying, standardizing, or potentially increasing visibility and awareness of privacy-related disclosures by requiring that specific notices regarding data collection, monitoring, or surveillance are labeled explicitly as surveillance notices. The sponsor listed is Susan Pha (co-sponsor).

Note: The bill text is not provided here beyond the title and introductory actions. The summary reflects the stated title and typical implications of such a naming/labeling requirement.

Key provisions (as implied by the title)

  • Mandatory labeling: Privacy notices that are currently required by law or regulation must be titled "surveillance notices" rather than under their existing titles.
  • Scope of notices: Likely applies to notices related to data collection, monitoring, tracking, or surveillance by state agencies, covered entities, or businesses subject to Minnesota privacy and consumer protection law. The exact list of covered notices would be specified in the bill’s text.
  • Placement and readability: The labeling requirement may specify how prominently the title must appear (e.g., at the top of the notice, in bold type, or in a specific font/size) to ensure visibility.
  • Compliance timeline: The bill would establish a timeline by which affected entities must begin using the surveillance notice title (effective date, compliance deadlines).

Who would be affected

  • State agencies and units required to issue privacy or surveillance-related notices.
  • Private sector entities and businesses subject to Minnesota privacy or consumer protection disclosure requirements that issue mandatory notices about data collection or monitoring.
  • Potentially vendors or contractors who handle notices on behalf of covered entities.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduction and first reading occurred on March 23, 2026.
  • Referred to the Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection on the same date.
  • Specific amendments, fiscal impact, and effective dates would be determined in committee consideration and in the bill’s final text.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Clarity and transparency: By requiring a consistent “surveillance notices” label, readers may more readily recognize notices that involve surveillance or monitoring of data.
  • Compliance burden: Entities would need to review existing notices and update titles, templates, and related materials to meet the labeling requirement.
  • Enforcement and penalties: The summary does not specify penalties; the bill text would indicate any enforcement mechanisms, compliance timelines, and remedies for noncompliance.
  • Public comprehension: A standardized label could improve public understanding of when data collection or monitoring is taking place.

If you can provide the full bill text, I can refine this summary with precise definitions, sections, affected statutes, compliance costs, and any fiscal notes or effective dates.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.