WeVote
Log In

Bill

WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 3369

Summary of HF 3369 (2025-2026) – Minnesota

Bill at a glance

  • Title: Centennial barns registry funding provided, and money appropriated
  • Session/Jurisdiction: Minnesota, 2025-2026
  • Introduction/Status: Introduced and first reading; referred to Legacy Finance (02/17/2026). Author added (02/23/2026). Co-sponsors include Leon Lillie, Brad Tabke, Mary Clardy, John Huot, Rick Hansen, Fue Lee, Liz Reyer.
  • Primary intent: Establish funding for a registry of Centennial barns and related activities, enabling preservation, documentation, and outreach tied to Minnesota’s historic agricultural barns.

Purpose and policy objective

HF 3369 seeks to create and support a formal mechanism (a registry) for Minnesota’s Centennial barns—heritage structures recognized for their historical significance in Minnesota’s agricultural and rural heritage. The bill focuses on providing funding to establish, maintain, and promote this registry, with the overall aim of preserving these structures, increasing public awareness, and supporting conservation efforts.

Key provisions and changes (as described)

  • Funding authorization: The bill provides state funding to support the Centennial barns registry. This includes appropriations to cover startup costs, ongoing administration, outreach, and related preservation activities.
  • Registry establishment and maintenance: Provisions likely outline the creation or designation of a registry, criteria for listing barns, process for nominating structures, and responsibilities for ongoing maintenance and updates.
  • Program scope and activities: Potential activities funded under the bill may include digital documentation, archival preservation, educational outreach, tours or events, partnerships with historical societies, and development of materials to raise public awareness about Centennial barns.
  • Administration: The bill may designate a state agency or partner organizations responsible for administering the registry and distributing funds, including reporting and oversight requirements.

Note: The bill summary here is based on the title and typical structuring of similar heritage registry funding bills. Final text would specify the exact eligible expenditures, matching requirements (if any), and program standards.

Who is affected

  • Historic preservation stakeholders: Nonprofits, historical societies, local government units, and private owners of qualifying Centennial barns would likely engage with the registry and funding program.
  • Communities and the public: Minnesota residents may benefit from increased awareness, potential tourism, and educational opportunities related to historic barns.
  • State agencies: A designated state agency (or agencies) would administer the registry, manage funds, and report on outcomes and expenditures.
  • Property owners/landowners: Owners of barns listed or seeking designation may be eligible for support or resources to assist preservation.

Procedural and timeline considerations

  • Introduction and committee referral: Referred to Legacy Finance, indicating consideration of the financial implications and appropriations impact.
  • Funding decisions: As an appropriations bill, HF 3369 would require passage by both legislative chambers and the governor’s signature to become law. Implementation would follow after appropriation, with potential program start dates aligned to fiscal planning cycles.
  • Reporting and accountability: Typically, funding bills of this type include reporting requirements to legislative committees, outlining how funds are spent, milestones achieved, and registry status updates.

Potential impact and considerations

  • Cultural and historical preservation: If enacted, the bill could enhance preservation of agricultural heritage, support artisans and communities connected to historic barns, and provide a tangible educational resource.
  • Economic considerations: Registry activities could drive heritage tourism and local engagement, with potential indirect economic benefits to rural communities.
  • Private property considerations: Depending on eligibility and nomination criteria, there may be voluntary designation processes that respect owner rights and private property considerations.

Next steps for readers

  • Monitor the bill’s text for precise definitions (eligibility criteria for registrants, funding amounts, grant/aid mechanisms, and reporting requirements).
  • Track fiscal committee actions in Legacy Finance for budgetary impact and appropriations levels.
  • Look for amendments that refine administration, match requirements, or establish partnership frameworks with local historical organizations.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.