WeVote

Bill

Bill

HRES 1056

Calling for the annulment of the Monroe Doctrine and the development of a "New Good Neighbor" policy in order to foster improved relations and deeper, more effective cooperation between the United States and its Latin American and Caribbean neighbors.

119th Congress Introduced by Greg Casar and 17 co-sponsors

The bill proposes replacing the Monroe Doctrine with a comprehensive New Good Neighbor policy to deepen cooperation, respect sovereignty, and promote inclusive development in Latin

Submitted in House
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HRES 1056

Summary of H.Res. 1056 (119th Congress)

Title: Calling for the annulment of the Monroe Doctrine and the development of a “New Good Neighbor” policy in order to foster improved relations and deeper, more effective cooperation between the United States and its Latin American and Caribbean neighbors

Status: Introduced February 10, 2026; referred to the House Committees on Foreign Affairs, Financial Services, and Ways and Means

Primary sponsors: Rep. Nydia Velázquez (and co-sponsors including Reps. Khanna, Garcia, Ramirez, Casar, Pocan, Johnson, Norton, Jayapal, Clarke, Ocasio-Cortez, Omar, Tlaib, Jackson, García, Summer Lee, Chuy García, and others)

Purpose and intent
- The bill advocates formally ending the Monroe Doctrine as a guiding policy toward Latin America and the Caribbean.
- It calls for a new framework, termed the “New Good Neighbor” policy, to improve diplomatic relations and broaden cooperation with Western Hemisphere nations.

Key provisions and proposed changes
1. Policy shift
- Directive to the Department of State to explicitly state that the Monroe Doctrine is no longer U.S. policy toward Latin America and the Caribbean.
- Establishment of a comprehensive “New Good Neighbor” policy to replace the Monroe Doctrine.

  1. Policy elements and actions under the New Good Neighbor

    • Economic development and trade:
      • Develop with multiple federal partners (Treasury, State, USAID) a development approach that respects sovereign economic plans, supports equitable and sustainable transitions, and prioritizes grants and concessional lending.
      • Create mechanisms for technology transfer and climate/green development finance.
    • Sanctions and unilateral measures:
      • Terminate unilateral U.S. sanctions, including the Cuba embargo; work with Congress to revoke or repeal such sanctions.
      • Propose amendments to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and the National Emergencies Act to ensure robust congressional oversight of unilateral sanctions.
      • Consider a legislative framework for automatic review of bilateral assistance if there is extraconstitutional transfer of power, until leadership is deemed legitimate by regional governments and the U.S. and regional partners.
    • Sovereignty and diplomacy:
      • Respect decisions by sovereign states on membership in international organizations, recognition, and other diplomatic matters.
      • Declassification of past U.S. archives related to coups, dictatorships, and human rights abuses in the region to promote transparency.
      • Reform of the Organization of American States (OAS) to enhance accountability, transparency, independence of electoral cooperation divisions, ombudsman oversight, and independence of key human rights bodies.
    • Financial and development institutions:
      • Increase contributions to the Amazon Fund.
      • Promote democratic reforms within international financial institutions (IMF, World Bank, Inter-American Development Bank) to empower developing regional economies.
      • Support regular issuance of IMF Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) to ease balance-of-payments pressures and expand fiscal space for health, education, climate action, and development.
      • Advocate for shifts away from austerity, loan conditionality, and regressive policies toward growth, universal health care, education, social protection, progressive taxation, and workers’ rights.
    • Climate action and resilience:
      • Establish a Loss and Damage Trust under the UN to support climate action in developing countries; secure recurring U.N.-level funding.
    • Regional cooperation agenda:
      • Collaborate with regional bodies (e.g., CELAC, CARICOM, UNASUR, MERCOSUR, and others) to address climate change, inequality, arms trafficking, illicit financial flows, workers’ rights, Indigenous and Afro-descendant rights, and other shared challenges.
  2. Oversight, governance, and accountability

    • Emphasizes full respect for international law and sovereignty in the Western Hemisphere.
    • Promotes human rights standards and prohibitions on extrajudicial killings.
    • Calls for transparency and accountability within regional bodies like the OAS and its leadership and electoral mechanisms.
  3. Related themes and historical context (as presented in the bill)

    • The bill provides a retrospective overview of U.S. interventions historically labeled as Monroe Doctrine-era interventions, including military invasions, coups, sanctions, and covert actions from the 19th to the 21st centuries.
    • It references past U.S. actions such as interventions in Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, the Banana Wars, and other regimes, as well as economic and military pressures that shaped U.S.-Latin America relations.
    • It notes contemporary policy debates about sanctions, illicit financial flows, ISDS provisions, and the role of regional organizations.

Impact and scope
- Targeted region: Latin America and the Caribbean.
- Domestic implications: Proposes legislative and executive actions to adjust sanctions policy, increase funding for development and climate programs, and reform U.S. engagement with regional institutions.
- International implications: Seeks to improve U.S.–regional relations by prioritizing sovereignty, human rights, transparency, climate finance, and inclusive development, while reducing unilateral coercive measures.

Notes
- As introduced, the bill is a sense-of-the-House resolution rather than a binding authorization or appropriation measure. It sets out a policy direction and proposed steps but would require further legislation and appropriations to implement many of its provisions.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.