WeVote

Bill

Bill

H 4512

Bond premium

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Chris Wooten

Massport gains expanded authority to plan, fund, build, operate and possibly lease Phase III of East Boston parks, in partnership with a 21-member Project Advisory Committee (PAC).

Referred to Committee on Judiciary
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · H 4512

Summary — H.4512 (House Docket No. 4897)

Title: An Act modernizing the governance of Port Authority parks in East Boston
Sponsor: Rep. Adrian C. Madaro (1st Suffolk)
Status / Timeline (as provided)
- Introduced / read first time: 2025-05-06
- Referred: Committee on Judiciary; then House Rules; reported to Environment & Natural Resources (rules suspended)
- House docket filed: 07/08/2025 (HD 4897)
- Senate concurred: 2025-09-11
- Hearing scheduled: 2025-10-21, 1:00–5:00 PM (A‑1)
- Related: HD 4897 (replaces)

Note on included materials: The provided packet also contains text from an unrelated South Carolina bill concerning bail bond premiums. That text appears to be erroneously appended and is summarized briefly at the end; the primary focus below is the Massachusetts bill text (East Boston parks).

Purpose / Intent

To update and modernize the statutory governance, planning, development and management framework for public parks operated by the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) in East Boston (outside Logan Airport). The bill revises definitions, clarifies phased park areas on the piers, formalizes the relationship/agreements between Massport and the local project advisory committee (PAC), and expands Massport’s powers with respect to planning, construction, operation, funding and potential conveyance/lease of park parcels.

Key provisions and changes

  • Amends chapter 349 of the Acts of 1986 (multiple sections) to modernize language and governance.
  • Definitions (replacement of Section 2):
    • “Parks” explicitly defined to include: Piers Park (Phase I, II, III), Bremen Street Park, Al Festa Little League field, and the Narrow Gauge Extension (near Wood Island Marsh).
    • “Piers” defined as Piers 1–4 in East Boston (part of port properties).
    • “PAC” defined as the East Boston Project Advisory Committee, Inc., consisting of 21 members (to be appointed per section 6).
    • “Plan” clarified: development divided into Phase I (existing Piers Park on Pier 4), Phase II (upland north of Pier 3), Phase III (Pier 3 — including pilings, bulkheads, structures, and land under Pier 3). Phase II and III areas are described with reference to specific City of Boston plan sheets (26N‑14E & 26N‑15E, 1962).
  • Massport powers (replacement of Section 4):
    • Authorized to enter into agreements with PAC covering planning, design, construction, use, operation, security, maintenance and financial responsibilities for the parks.
    • May design (in consultation with PAC), construct, improve, maintain and secure parks and associated facilities as public parks.
    • Authorized to apply for and receive public or private funds (gifts, grants, bequests) and expend them on park design, construction and operation.
    • Subject to PAC approval, Massport may convey or lease Phase III (or parts of it), including buildings/facilities, to an entity other than The Trustees of the Reservations for use and operation as a public park.
    • Broad “carry out purposes” authority for the Division (Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance) on behalf of the Commonwealth, in consultation with the Department of Conservation and Recreation (replaces prior Section 3 wording).
  • Other sections (e.g., Section 5) are amended but text in the provided document is truncated and not fully analyzable.

Who is affected

  • Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport): gains clarified statutory authority for parks development and management and expanded discretion to contract, fundraise, convey/lease Phase III.
  • East Boston Project Advisory Committee (PAC): formal role in planning review, approvals, and financial responsibilities; PAC membership set at 21.
  • East Boston residents and park users: changes could affect planning, operations, access, funding and long‑term stewardship of waterfront parks.
  • City and state agencies: Department of Conservation & Recreation and the Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance are referenced for consultation/implementation.
  • Potential private or nonprofit entities: may be eligible to lease/operate Phase III with PAC approval (explicitly allows conveyance to entities other than The Trustees).

Potential impacts / implications

  • Clarifies and consolidates statutory definitions and geographic scope of the parks project (Phases I–III), potentially accelerating planning and permitting.
  • Formalizes a partnership model between Massport and a community advisory entity (PAC), including shared review and financial responsibilities.
  • Enables Massport to solicit and accept private/public funds for park work, potentially increasing resources for construction and maintenance.
  • Allows leasing/conveyance of Phase III to non‑Trustees entities subject to PAC approval, which may broaden potential operators but could raise oversight and stewardship questions.
  • Specific project boundaries tied to historic plan sheets could affect exact scope and jurisdictional responsibilities.

Procedural notes

  • Bill has progressed through initial committee referrals; hearing scheduled 10/21/2025 (per docket). Some text (Section 5 onward) is truncated in the supplied document; final legislative language should be reviewed when available.

Brief note on unrelated appended text (South Carolina bond premium bill)

The supplied packet includes a separate South Carolina bill that would (if enacted) cap bail bond premiums at 15% of face amount, require a minimum charge of $100 or 10% (whichever greater) collected up front, and permit payment agreements over 10% subject to limits (e.g., up to 18 months), with procedural protections for missed payments and collateral handling. This SC material appears unrelated to H.4512 (MA) and was likely included in error.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.