WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 472

Boards and Commissions - As introduced, prohibits the exclusion of persons from membership on state regulatory and health related boards on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, and national origin; prohibits such boards from establishing or operating under race-based policies pertaining to their composition; creates a private cause of action against a board and its officers, employees, and agents for such practices. - Amends TCA Title 4, Chapter 21; Title 9; Title 62 and Title 63.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Jason Zachary

Prohibits Tennessee state regulatory boards from race-based exclusion or composition policies and allows private lawsuits for violations.

P2C, ref. to State & Local Government Committee
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 472

Legislative bill overview

HB 472 would prohibit state regulatory and health-related boards from excluding members based on race, color, ethnicity, or national origin, and would ban these boards from using race-based policies for composition. The bill creates a private right of action allowing individuals to sue boards and their officials for violations.

Why is this important

Board composition affects regulatory outcomes in healthcare, licensing, and other sectors that impact public welfare. This legislation directly addresses whether diversity-focused appointment practices are permissible under state law, touching on ongoing national debates about affirmative action and representation in government institutions.

Potential points of contention

  • Definitional scope: The bill's language around "race-based policies" is broad and could be interpreted to restrict diversity initiatives, mentorship programs, or outreach efforts, not just explicit racial quotas
  • Private litigation exposure: Creating a private cause of action may increase litigation costs for boards and potentially chill legitimate diversity efforts, though supporters argue it ensures accountability
  • Conflict with federal law: Some board composition requirements may stem from federal programs or grants with their own diversity mandates, creating potential legal conflicts

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.