WeVote

Bill

Bill

HF 4005

Biometric data; consent for collection required, sale prohibited, deletion required, and civil penalties imposed.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Sandra Feist and 1 co-sponsor

Minnesota bill requiring consent for biometric collection, prohibiting sale of such data, and imposing civil penalties for violations.

Author added Feist
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 4005

Legislative bill overview

HF 4005 establishes comprehensive regulations governing the collection, use, and retention of biometric data in Minnesota. The bill requires explicit consent before collecting biometric information, prohibits the sale of biometric data, mandates deletion upon request, and establishes civil penalties for violations.

Why is this important

Biometric data—including fingerprints, facial recognition, iris scans, and DNA—is increasingly collected by both public and private entities, yet most states lack specific legal frameworks governing its use. This bill addresses privacy concerns by giving Minnesotans control over their biological identifiers and creating enforceable consequences for misuse, which could influence how businesses and government agencies handle sensitive personal information.

Potential points of contention

  • Consent requirements: Businesses may argue that blanket consent requirements create operational burdens, particularly for employers, schools, and security systems that currently use biometrics without explicit individual authorization
  • Economic impact on biometric industry: The prohibition on selling biometric data could affect companies developing facial recognition, identity verification, and other biometric technology services that rely on data licensing
  • Definition and scope ambiguity: The bill's precise definitions of "biometric data" and exceptions (law enforcement, national security, medical necessity) will likely face debate regarding how broadly or narrowly it applies
  • Enforcement mechanisms: Questions about which agency enforces violations, the civil penalty amounts, and whether private citizens can sue may create implementation challenges

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.