WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SCR 1020

ballot measures; judges; odd-numbered years

57th Legislature - First Regular Session Introduced by Mark Finchem

Arizona constitutional amendment moving judicial elections from even to odd years, potentially reducing voter turnout in judicial races.

Senate Second Reading
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SCR 1020

Legislative bill overview

SCR 1020 proposes a constitutional amendment to move judicial elections from even-numbered years (federal election years) to odd-numbered years in Arizona. This would require voter approval through a statewide ballot measure and would fundamentally alter the timing of when Arizona holds elections for judicial offices.

Why is this important

Judicial elections held separately from federal elections could reduce voter participation in judicial races, as odd-year elections historically see lower turnout. This timing change affects how judges are selected and could influence which candidates run for office, the funding available to campaigns, and ultimately the composition of Arizona's courts.

Potential points of contention

  • Voter participation: Odd-year elections typically have significantly lower voter turnout, which may reduce the democratic legitimacy of judicial selections and advantage certain candidates or interests with greater resources to mobilize voters
  • Campaign financing: Separating judicial elections from high-profile federal elections could affect fundraising dynamics, potentially benefiting well-funded candidates or special interest groups that can afford standalone election campaigns
  • Voter confusion and access: Holding elections in odd years requires voters to track additional election dates, potentially creating confusion and reducing overall electoral participation across all ballot measures and races

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.