WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 2155

Authorizes the city of New York to establish a residential parking system in the postal designation and area of Queens village near the UBS arena

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Leroy Comrie

New Jersey bans public colleges and booster clubs from sports-wagering partnerships with operators; foundations may partner only if no student advertising; takes effect now.

REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 2155

Summary — Senate Bill No. 2155 (as reflected in provided documents)

Note on document consistency: The materials provided include multiple different bills that share the number “S 2155” (including a New Jersey bill concerning sports wagering partnerships at public higher‑education institutions and a Massachusetts bill to establish a commission on the status of transgender people). The title you supplied (authorizing NYC to establish a residential parking system near UBS Arena) does not match the full text excerpts below. This summary focuses on the principal, fully described measure in the documents: the New Jersey bill prohibiting sports‑wagering partnerships at public institutions of higher education.

Purpose

To prohibit public institutions of higher education from entering into commercial “sports wagering partnerships” with sports‑wagering operators or intermediaries — removing institutional participation in sponsorship/advertising deals tied to sports betting.

Key provisions

  • Defines “sports wagering partnership” as any partnership or contractual agreement between a sports‑wagering operator or intermediary and a public institution of higher education (including an athletic department or booster club) that grants access to advertise in stadiums/facilities, in digital or broadcast sports content, or by other means.
  • Prohibits public institutions of higher education from participating in sports wagering partnerships.
  • Carves out limited exceptions:
    • Foundations institutionally related to a public institution may enter partnerships only if the arrangement does not include “direct advertising or marketing” to enrolled students. “Direct advertising or marketing” explicitly includes:
    • advertising/marketing at on‑campus locations and off‑campus locations associated with the institution, and
    • electronic advertising or marketing explicitly directed to students enrolled at the institution.
    • The prohibition does not apply to partnerships with casino licensees, sports‑wagering licensees, or their contracted operators when the partnership is established for academic purposes or provides experiential learning opportunities to students.
  • Effective date: the act is written to take effect immediately upon enactment.

Who is affected

  • Directly affected: public colleges and universities in New Jersey (their athletic departments and booster clubs), and sports‑wagering operators/intermediaries seeking institutional advertising/sponsorship access.
  • Indirectly affected: institutionally related foundations (subject to the student‑marketing restriction), students (reduced exposure to direct sports‑betting marketing on campus), advertisers, and partners that currently sponsor campus athletics.

Procedural/timeline notes (from provided records)

  • The bill (as cited in the materials) was reported favorably with committee amendments by the Senate Higher Education Committee (May 22, 2025).
  • A substituted Assembly version appears as A4113 (1R); documents show a substitution on June 2, 2025.
  • The text states the act would take effect immediately upon enactment.
  • Because the record set provided contains mixed and overlapping entries (including references to other jurisdictions and actions), interested readers should confirm current status and exact caption in the official legislative database of the relevant state (New Jersey) before relying on the procedural history.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Limits revenue‑generating sponsorships between public institutions and sports‑betting firms, potentially reducing external funding tied to athletics branding.
  • Aims to reduce direct targeting of enrolled students with sports‑betting advertising while permitting academic/experiential collaborations and limited foundation engagement under strict conditions.
  • May prompt institutions to re‑evaluate existing contracts and future sponsorship strategies; legal and contract wind‑down/transition issues could arise for active agreements.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.