WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 1009

Authorizes a veteran's close friend or family member who is reasonably familiar with such veteran's wishes to request that such veteran be buried in a state veterans' cemetery

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Joe Addabbo and 6 co-sponsors

Authorizes a veteran’s close friend or family member familiar with the veteran’s wishes to request burial in a state veterans’ cemetery when no written directive or designated repr

REFERRED TO VETERANS' AFFAIRS
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 1009

Summary — Bill S 1009 (materials received)

Note: the materials you provided appear to contain multiple different bills from different jurisdictions that share the number "S 1009" (Idaho, Massachusetts, and mixed legislative-action metadata). The title you supplied — "Authorizes a veteran's close friend or family member who is reasonably familiar with such veteran's wishes to request that such veteran be buried in a state veterans' cemetery" — describes a veterans‑burial proposal, but no bill text for that specific proposal was included. Below I summarize (A) what can be inferred about the veterans‑burial proposal from the title/status, and (B) the actual documents in your packet (which concern other topics and jurisdictions). If you want a formal summary of the veterans‑burial bill, please provide its text or an authoritative bill link.

A. Intended veterans‑burial bill (based on provided title & status)

  • Purpose: Authorize a veteran’s close friend or family member — if they are “reasonably familiar” with the veteran’s wishes — to request that the veteran be interred in a state veterans’ cemetery when the veteran’s own written directive or a designated representative is not available.
  • Key provisions likely to appear (title-level, not verbatim law):
    • Recognition of “close friend or family member” and a standard (e.g., “reasonably familiar with the veteran’s wishes”) as sufficient to make burial requests.
    • Authorization for state veterans’ cemetery administrators to accept such requests as evidence of burial intent in the absence of other documentation.
    • Administrative procedures for verifying the claimant’s relationship/familiarity (e.g., sworn statement, witnesses, supporting documents).
    • Potential protections for cemetery administrators relying in good faith on the requester’s representations.
  • Who would be affected: veterans and their next-of-kin or close friends; state veterans’ cemeteries and their administrators; state veterans’ affairs agencies.
  • Procedural/timing aspects: Status shown as REFERRED TO VETERANS' AFFAIRS (introduced March 12, 2025). No effective date or fiscal statement for this specific text was provided.

B. Actual documents included in your packet (conflicting content)

  1. Idaho — Senate Bill No. 1009 (Idaho Legislature, 68th Legislature, 2025)

    • Text: Repeals Section 46-802, Idaho Code (the statute that prohibited unorganized associations from parading in public with firearms).
    • Emergency clause: Act to take effect July 1, 2025.
    • Fiscal note (proponent-prepared): Minimal General Fund impact; only printing/dissemination costs. Stated purpose: support First and Second Amendment rights.
    • Sponsor contact: Senator Daniel D. Foreman (per fiscal note header).

  2. Massachusetts — Senate Docket No. 2014 / Senate No. 1009 (2025 General Court)

    • Text: Adds subsection (o) to G.L. c. 6A, §16G directing the Secretary of Housing & Economic Development, in consultation with the Rural Policy Advisory Commission, to establish a rural development initiative administered through a contract with the Massachusetts Development Finance Agency. Purpose: technical assistance, spur investment/jobs, accelerate community planning in rural communities.
    • Filed by: Senator Paul W. Mark.

  3. Mixed legislative actions & sponsors (confusing/overlapping)

    • A long list of procedural entries (introduced, referred to committees, hearings scheduled, passed Senate, delivered to Assembly, etc.) is present but inconsistent across jurisdictions.
    • A sponsors list includes U.S. Senators (e.g., Richard J. Durbin, Michael Bennet, Amy Klobuchar) and state legislators (e.g., Samra Brouk), indicating pieces from multiple legislatures were merged.

Implications & next steps

  • The packet is internally inconsistent. I cannot prepare an authoritative, clause‑level summary of the veterans‑burial bill without its text.
  • Please provide one of the following for a precise summary:
    • Full bill text (PDF or plain text) of the veterans‑burial S 1009 you want summarized, or
    • A legislative URL (state or federal) identifying the bill and jurisdiction.
  • If you intended summary of the Idaho repeal or the Massachusetts rural development bill, confirm which one and I will produce a focused, detailed summary.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.