APPROPRIATIONS – OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL – Relates to the appropriation to the Office of the Attorney General for fiscal years 2026 and 2027.

68th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session (2026)

Idaho appropriates funds to the Attorney General's office for fiscal years 2026-2027, determining resources for criminal prosecution, consumer protection, and state legal defense.

Rules Suspended: Ayes 68 Nays 1 Abs/Excd 1, read in full as required – FAILED - 33-37-0AYES – Alfieri, Barbieri, Beiswenger, Boyle, Bruce, Burgoyne, Cannon, Crane(12), Crane(13), Ehardt, Ehlers, Fuhriman, Hall(Stone), Harris, Hawkins, Healey, Hill, Holtzclaw, Mendive, Miller, Mitchell, Palmer, Price, Rasor, Redman, Scott, Shepherd, Shirts, Skaug, Tanner(13), Tanner(14), Vander Woude, WisniewskiNAYS – Berch, Bingham, Cayler, Cheatum, Church, Cornilles, Dygert, Egbert, Erickson, Furniss, Galaviz, Gannon, Garner, Green, Handy, Haws, Hostetler, Leavitt, Manwaring, Marmon, Mathias, McCann, Mickelsen, Monks, Nelsen, Petzke, Pickett, Pohanka, Raybould, Raymond, Rubel, Sauter, Thompson, Veile, Weber, Wheeler, Mr. SpeakerAbsent – NoneFloor Sponsor - BruceFiled in Office of the Chief Clerk

#appropriations #attorneygeneral

Legislative bill overview

H 951 is a budget appropriation bill that allocates funding to Idaho's Office of the Attorney General for fiscal years 2026 and 2027. The bill has just been introduced and referred to the Judiciary and Rules Committee for printing, so the specific dollar amounts and funding priorities have not yet been made public.

Why is this important

The Attorney General's office handles criminal prosecution, consumer protection, civil litigation on behalf of the state, and other legal matters affecting all Idaho residents. Budget appropriations determine what resources—staff, technology, and operations—this office has to fulfill these functions.

Potential points of contention

Budget size: Legislators may debate whether proposed funding levels are adequate, excessive, or misaligned with state priorities

Specific allocations: Disagreement could arise over how funds are distributed among different divisions (criminal prosecution, consumer protection, civil litigation, etc.)

Policy priorities: Funding decisions may reflect or conflict with broader legislative priorities, such as addressing specific crime categories or consumer issues