WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 1373

APPROPRIATIONS – ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT – Relates to the maintenance appropriation to Economic Development for fiscal year 2027.

68th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session (2026)

Idaho appropriates FY2027 maintenance funding to Economic Development agency to sustain current operations and programs supporting business recruitment and workforce development.

Signed by Governor on 03/19/26 Session Law Chapter 70 Effective: 07/01/2026
#administrativehearingsoffice #agriculture #appropriations #commerce #commissions #finance #grants #healthandsocialservicesombudsman #historicalsociety #state #industrialcommission #insurance #labor #librariesandlibrarians #lottery #occupationalandprofessionallicenses #pardonsandparole #soil #stateappellatepublicdefender #statepublicdefender #transportation #utilities #veterans #water
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 1373

Legislative bill overview

S 1373 is a fiscal year 2027 appropriations bill that allocates maintenance funding to Idaho's Economic Development agency. The bill passed both chambers of the legislature with broad support (54-15-1 in the House) and has been signed by both the Speaker and President, moving toward gubernatorial approval.

Why is this important

Appropriations bills directly determine how state agencies operate and what programs they can fund or maintain. This bill ensures Idaho's economic development efforts—which typically include business recruitment, workforce development, and infrastructure support—continue functioning in the upcoming fiscal year. The specific dollar amounts and program priorities within this appropriation affect job creation and business investment across the state.

Potential points of contention

  • Maintenance vs. expansion funding: The bill appears focused on "maintenance appropriation," meaning it sustains current operations rather than funding new initiatives, which some may view as insufficient for economic growth during inflationary periods
  • Budget prioritization: 15 representatives voted against it, suggesting disagreement over whether this funding level is appropriate relative to other state priorities or concerns about economic development spending effectiveness
  • Lack of public detail: The bill summary provided contains no information about specific dollar amounts, program breakdowns, or measurable outcomes, making it difficult to assess whether funds are allocated efficiently

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.