WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SF 5034

Analysis of the statewide economic impact of increased immigration enforcement in Minnesota appropriation

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Susan Pha

A one-time $250,000 study by DEED will analyze the statewide economic impacts of intensified immigration enforcement, including labor, small businesses, and regional effects.

Referred to Jobs and Economic Development
#employmentandeconomicdevelopmentdepartment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 5034

Summary of SF 5034 (2025-2026) — Minnesota

Purpose and intent

SF 5034 would authorize a one-time appropriation to fund a comprehensive statewide analysis of the economic impact of increased immigration enforcement in Minnesota. The study is to cover operations associated with the December 2025 “Operation Metro Surge” and assess effects on the state’s workforce, small businesses, and broader economy. The bill directs the preparation of a report detailing these impacts and requires delivery to legislative leadership by February 1, 2027.

Key provisions and changes

  • Funding and duration

    • Appropriates $250,000 in FY 2027 from the General Fund to the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED).
    • Purpose: conduct a comprehensive analysis of the statewide economic impact of heightened immigration enforcement beginning in 2025, including Operation Metro Surge.
    • This is a one-time appropriation.

  • Scope of analysis
    The analysis must evaluate, at minimum, the following areas:

    1. Labor market effects
      • Impacts on labor force participation, workforce availability, and sector-specific workforce shortages.
    2. Small and microbusiness impacts
      • Effects on family-owned, immigrant-owned, and locally owned businesses, considering hiring challenges, operational costs, business continuity, and long-term sustainability.
    3. Sector-specific impacts
      • Industries including agriculture, food processing, construction, health care, hospitality, manufacturing, transportation, and retail.
    4. Operational and supply-chain effects
      • Implications for business operations, productivity, and risks of closures or relocations.
    5. Regional economic impacts
      • Comparisons across Minnesota counties and distinctions among rural, suburban, and urban areas, to the extent feasible.
    6. Macro-economic effects
      • Impacts on consumer spending, state/local tax revenue, and overall economic output.

  • Methodology and sources

    • The analysis may incorporate data from academic institutions, Minnesota businesses, state agencies, and other available economic data sources.
    • The commissioner may solicit proposals and enter contracts with a nonpartisan third party to prepare the report.

  • Reporting deadline

    • A final report must be submitted to the chairs and ranking minority members of the legislature’s committees with jurisdiction over workforce and economic development by February 1, 2027.

Who is affected

  • Geographic scope: The analysis is statewide, with attention to regional variations (counties, rural/suburban/urban distinctions) where practicable.
  • Economic actors:
    • Labor market participants (workers, job seekers, and potential shortages across sectors).
    • Small and microbusinesses, including family-owned and immigrant-owned enterprises.
    • Large and small employers across key sectors (agriculture, construction, health care, etc.).
  • Public bodies: Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) leads the analysis; may work with academic institutions, state agencies, and nonpartisan contractors.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Bill status: Introduced and referred to the Jobs and Economic Development committee (April 2026); co-sponsored by Susan Pha.
  • Key dates:
    • Effective funding and initiation: beginning in 2025 (as referenced by the bill text).
    • Report due: February 1, 2027.
  • Process: DEED would administer the study, possibly issuing proposals and contracting with a nonpartisan third party to produce the report.

Observations

  • The bill is narrowly focused on assessing economic impacts rather than altering immigration policy itself.
  • It seeks a data-driven evaluation of the consequences of intensified immigration enforcement, providing policymakers with insights on labor markets, small businesses, and regional economies.
  • The one-time $250,000 appropriation is relatively modest in scale but aims to produce a comprehensive, externally sourced analysis.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.