WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

H 4479

An Act to rescind all previous calls for a federal constitutional convention

194th Legislature (2025-2026) Introduced by Lindsay Sabadosa

Massachusetts withdraws all previous calls for a federal constitutional convention, removing the state from efforts to trigger an Article V convention.

Accompanied a study order, see H5466 (under House Rule 27)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · H 4479

Legislative bill overview

H 4479 directs Massachusetts to formally withdraw all previous applications and resolutions calling for a federal constitutional convention. The bill effectively reverses Massachusetts's historical positions on convening a convention to propose amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which states can request under Article V of the Constitution.

Why is this important

A constitutional convention is a rare and consequential mechanism—only one has been held (in 1787), and modern proposals are contentious because a convention could theoretically amend any part of the Constitution, not just targeted provisions. By rescinding prior calls, Massachusetts removes itself from ongoing efforts by various groups (both progressive and conservative) seeking to use Article V to force a convention on specific issues like campaign finance, balanced budgets, or term limits. This reflects a deliberate policy choice about constitutional governance.

Potential points of contention

  • Unintended consequences of conventions: Opponents may argue rescinding these calls eliminates an important democratic tool for fundamental reform if elected branches become unresponsive; proponents counter that opening the Constitution risks uncontrolled changes.
  • Historical precedent confusion: Ambiguity exists about which prior resolutions Massachusetts has passed and whether rescission actually reverses their legal effect under Article V procedures.
  • Ideological divide: Different groups favor or oppose convention calls depending on what amendments they hope to advance (term limits, campaign finance restrictions, etc.), making this a proxy battle over constitutional reform philosophy.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.