An Act to eliminate excessive regulation of the cannabis industry
Align cannabis security rules with pharmacy standards to cut costs and reduce burden; CCC must overhaul 935 CMR regs within 1 year to implement the change.
Align cannabis security rules with pharmacy standards to cut costs and reduce burden; CCC must overhaul 935 CMR regs within 1 year to implement the change.
HD 2063 seeks to reduce perceived over-regulation in Massachusetts’s cannabis sector by ensuring marijuana security requirements are not more restrictive or costly to comply with than security regulations governing pharmacies. The bill also directs a formal regulatory review to bring cannabis regulations in line with pharmacy standards, aiming to balance public safety with regulatory efficiency.
Section 1 (Chapter 94G, sec. 4(c)(1))
Adds a clause stating that marijuana establishments may not be subject to regulations more restrictive or expensive to comply with than security requirements applicable to pharmacy registrations, per 247 CMR 6.02(6).
Section 2 (Chapter 94G, sec. 12(a)(1))
Adds language after “personnel” clarifying that security requirements for marijuana establishments shall not be more restrictive or costly than those for pharmacy registrations (per 247 CMR 6.02(6)).
Section 3 (Chapter 94I, sec. 7)
For Medical Marijuana Treatment Centers and medical-use regulations, provides that security requirements shall not be more restrictive or expensive than the security rules for pharmacies (per 247 CMR 6.02(6)).
Section 4 (Regulatory review by CCC)
The Cannabis Control Commission must review and amend its regulations (including 935 CMR 500.110 et seq. and 935 CMR 501.110 et seq.) to comply with the act within one year of enactment.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.