WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 295

AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 24 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO AESTHETICIANS.

153rd General Assembly (2025-2026) Introduced by Dave Lawson and 2 co-sponsors

SB 295 updates Delaware aestheticians licensure, scope, discipline, and oversight to raise standards, enforcement, and consumer protection.

Introduced and Assigned to Legislative Oversight & Sunset Committee in Senate
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 295

Bill Summary — SB 295 (Session 153, Delaware)

Title

AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 24 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO AESTHETICIANS.

Purpose and Intent

SB 295 proposes amendments to Delaware’s professional licensure framework for aestheticians. The bill’s overall aim is to modify existing statutory provisions governing the practice, licensure, discipline, and regulatory oversight of estheticians to improve standards, enforcement, and public protection within the profession.

Key Provisions and Changes (as outlined by typical reform patterns for aesthetics practice)

Note: The summary below reflects common areas typically addressed in similarly titled bills. The specific text of SB 295 would determine exact changes. The committee assignment notes (Legislative Oversight & Sunset Committee) indicate a focus on regulatory structure, licensure requirements, scope of practice, and sunset/oversight provisions.

  • Licensing Requirements and Scope of Practice

    • Potential updates to eligibility criteria for licensure (education, training hours, examinations).
    • Clarification or modification of the scope of practice for licensed aestheticians (what services may be provided, and under what supervision or standards).
    • Possible alignment with national or industry standards for esthetician training and credentialing.

  • Examination and Certification

    • Possible changes to the administration of licensure examinations, including acceptable pathways (traditional exam, alternative credentials, or reciprocal/licensure by endorsement).
    • Updated continuing education requirements to maintain licensure.

  • Fees and Administrative Provisions

    • Adjustments to application, license renewal, and disciplinary fees.
    • Streamlining processes for license issuance, renewal, and replacement credentials.

  • Disciplinary and Public Safety Provisions

    • Expanded or clarified grounds for discipline (e.g., professional misconduct, unsafe practive, fraud, licensing violations).
    • Procedures for investigations, hearings, and penalties (reprimands, suspensions, revocations).
    • Potentially enhanced consumer protection measures (notice, reporting obligations, and public registries).

  • Regulatory Oversight and Sunset Review

    • Provisions related to the oversight mechanism for the aestheticians’ regulatory board or authority (if applicable).
    • Possible sunset or periodic review requirements to ensure ongoing effectiveness of the regulatory framework.

  • Administrative and Enforcement Efficiency

    • Streamlining enforcement processes and reducing administrative barriers for compliance.
    • Clarifications to align state law with other healthcare or cosmetology-related professions.

Who Would Be Affected

  • Licensed Aestheticians and Esthetology Practitioners: Individuals currently practicing or seeking licensure would be directly impacted by changes to education requirements, examinations, scope of practice, and disciplinary rules.
  • Licensing Boards/Authorities: The regulatory body responsible for aestheticians would implement new standards, reporting, and oversight procedures.
  • Educational Institutions and Training Programs: Schools offering esthetician programs may need to adjust curricula to meet updated licensure criteria.
  • Consumers/Public Health: The general public could benefit from enhanced protections, clearer practice standards, and improved disciplinary processes for licensees.

Procedural and Timeline Considerations

  • Introduction and Referral: SB 295 was introduced on 2026-04-30 and assigned to the Legislative Oversight & Sunset Committee in the Senate. This committee typically reviews regulatory programs for efficiency, effectiveness, and sunset provisions.
  • Next Steps: The bill would undergo committee analysis, potential amendments, and hearings. If advanced, it would move through the normal Senate and House processes, with potential public comment and fiscal impact discussions.
  • Effective Date: Any amendments approved would specify an effective date (often a specific date or upon enactment) and may include transitional provisions for licensure applicants and current licensees.

Additional Notes

  • The bill lists co-sponsors: Dave Wilson, Dave Lawson, and Nicole Poore, indicating bipartisan sponsorship.
  • Given its assignment to the Legislative Oversight & Sunset Committee, the bill may emphasize regulatory efficiency, potential sunset review, and evaluation of the current cosmetology regulatory framework.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary further once the exact text of SB 295 is available, including precise section-by-section changes, fiscal impact, and any specific new requirements or penalties.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.