WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 324

AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 16 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO TATTOO PARLORS, BODY PIERCING ESTABLISHMENTS, AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING.

153rd General Assembly (2025-2026) Introduced by Frank Cooke and 10 co-sponsors

Delaware strengthens tattoo and body piercing establishment regulations to include human trafficking prevention measures and oversight standards.

Passed By Senate. Votes: 21 YES
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 324

Legislative bill overview

HB 324 amends Delaware's regulations governing tattoo parlors and body piercing establishments, with provisions designed to address human trafficking concerns. The bill modifies Title 16 of the Delaware Code to establish or strengthen standards for these establishments, likely including licensing requirements, safety protocols, and anti-trafficking measures. The specific amendments aim to create better oversight and coordination between these regulated businesses and authorities working to identify and prevent human trafficking.

Why is this important

Tattoo and piercing establishments can inadvertently become venues where trafficking victims are exploited or where traffickers recruit vulnerable individuals. By strengthening regulatory frameworks and requiring staff training or reporting protocols, Delaware can leverage these businesses as part of a broader anti-trafficking strategy. This approach recognizes that regulated industries have a role in identifying and reporting suspicious activity that may indicate human trafficking.

Potential points of contention

  • Regulatory burden on small businesses: Tattoo and piercing shops are typically small, independent operators who may face increased compliance costs and administrative requirements, potentially creating barriers to entry or operation.
  • Privacy and data collection concerns: Enhanced reporting or information-gathering requirements could raise customer privacy issues if establishments must collect or report personal data under trafficking prevention protocols.
  • Vagueness in implementation: Without clear definitions of what constitutes trafficking indicators or suspicious activity, business owners may struggle to understand their obligations and face liability concerns for inadequate reporting.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.