WeVote

Bill

Bill

SB 2063

AN ACT to amend and reenact section 24-02-20 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to bid delays for construction contracts.

69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26)

Would require Illinois medical-malpractice insurers to price OB-GYN premiums by actual scope of practice, classifying gynecology-only doctors as lower risk with DOI guidelines.

Filed with Secretary Of State 04/08
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 2063

SB 2063 — Summary (OB‑GYN Malpractice Premium Adjustment Law)

Status
- According to the provided metadata, SB 2063 — the “OB‑GYN Malpractice Premium Adjustment Law” — died in committee. (The legislative-action list includes multiple, partly conflicting entries; this summary treats the bill text and the stated final status as authoritative.)

Purpose and intent
- To require medical‑malpractice insurers in Illinois to account for the specific scope of practice of obstetrician‑gynecologists (OB‑GYNs) when setting premium rates, and to direct insurers to classify OB‑GYNs who do not provide obstetric services (i.e., who perform gynecology‑only care) as lower‑risk for premium purposes. The goal is to produce “fair and equitable” premiums that reflect lower liability exposure for physicians who do not deliver babies.

Key provisions
- Statutory changes: Amends 215 ILCS 5/155.18 and adds a new Section 155.18b to the Illinois Insurance Code.
- Definitions:
- “Gynecologic services” — care related to female reproductive health, excluding obstetric services.
- “Obstetric services” — care related to pregnancy, labor, delivery, and postpartum care.
- “OB‑GYN” — a physician specializing in obstetric and gynecologic services under the Medical Practice Act.
- Underwriting and rating requirements:
- Insurers that issue medical‑liability insurance must evaluate premium rates based on the insured OB‑GYN’s actual scope of practice (whether they provide obstetric services such as childbirth or limit practice to gynecology).
- Insurers must classify OB‑GYNs who do not provide obstetric care as lower‑risk providers for premium determination.
- The Illinois Department of Insurance (DOI) must establish guidelines for insurers to classify OB‑GYNs and adjust premiums consistent with risk profiles.
- Conflict provision: Where this new Section 155.18b conflicts with existing Section 155.18, the new section controls to the extent of the conflict.

Who would be affected
- Primary: OB‑GYN physicians in Illinois (particularly those who practice gynecology only vs. those who provide obstetric care).
- Insurers: Companies issuing medical‑liability (malpractice) insurance for physicians would need to revise classification and rating practices, filings, and actuarial assumptions.
- Oversight: Illinois Department of Insurance would be required to develop classification/adjustment guidelines and supervise compliance.
- Indirectly: hospitals, patients, and employer groups could see secondary effects through physician workforce, insurance market dynamics, and premium pass‑throughs.

Potential impacts and considerations
- Intended effect: Lower malpractice premiums for gynecology‑only OB‑GYNs if DOI guidelines and insurer classifications reflect reduced liability exposure.
- Not specified: The bill does not set mandated percentage reductions or dollar amounts; premium adjustments would follow insurer actuarial filings and DOI guidance.
- Administrative effects: Insurers would incur administrative/actuarial work to implement new classifications and file rate changes; DOI would need resources to draft and enforce guidelines.
- Health‑care access: Supporters might argue lower premiums could encourage retention/recruitment of gynecology‑only providers; opponents might raise concerns about rate segmentation or unintended market consequences.

Procedural notes (from provided record)
- Sponsor listed in bill text: Sen. Paul Faraci; other sponsors/primaries listed in metadata.
- Introduced in early 2025 (document contains both Feb and March entry dates). The provided legislative-action log contains multiple committee and floor entries but the metadata indicates the bill ultimately died in committee.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.