WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 5028

AN ACT REMOVING THE PUBLIC BENEFITS CHARGE FROM ELECTRIC BILLS.

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Tim Ackert and 15 co-sponsors

HB 5028 removes the Public Benefits Charge from Connecticut electric bills, lowering consumer costs but eliminating dedicated funding for energy efficiency, renewable energy, and low-income assistance programs.

REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Energy and Technology
#electricdistributioncompanysystemsbenefitcharge
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 5028

Legislative bill overview

HB 5028 proposes eliminating the Public Benefits Charge (PBC) from Connecticut electric bills. The PBC is a surcharge currently added to residential and commercial electricity bills that funds energy efficiency programs, renewable energy development, and low-income assistance initiatives. This bill would remove that funding mechanism entirely.

Why is this important

The PBC currently generates tens of millions of dollars annually for Connecticut's energy programs. Removing it would lower electricity bills for consumers but would simultaneously eliminate dedicated funding for energy efficiency rebates, solar incentives, weatherization assistance, and utility bill assistance for low-income households—programs that currently serve thousands of residents and support the state's clean energy goals.

Potential points of contention

  • Consumer bill savings vs. program elimination: While ratepayers would see lower monthly bills, the state would lose a dedicated revenue stream for energy efficiency and renewable energy programs unless alternative funding is identified
  • Impact on clean energy transition: Connecticut has renewable energy targets; eliminating the PBC could slow solar adoption incentives and energy efficiency improvements that help meet these goals
  • Equity concerns: Low-income bill assistance and weatherization programs funded through the PBC serve vulnerable populations; removal could disproportionately affect those groups unless replaced with general tax funding
  • Administrative complexity: Would require identifying alternative funding sources or restructuring existing energy programs, potentially creating budget gaps or shifting costs elsewhere

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.