WeVote

Bill

Bill

H 4852

An Act relative to supported decision-making agreements for certain adults

194th Legislature (2025-2026) Introduced by Jim Arciero and 35 co-sponsors

Creates a rights-based framework for supported decision-making as an alternative to guardianship, with trained supporters, record access, oversight, and abuse protections.

Reporting date extended to Thursday, December 31, 2026
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · H 4852

Summary of Bill: H.4852 (Session 194th) — An Act relative to supported decision-making agreements for certain adults

Purpose and intent

  • Establishes a framework to recognize and regulate supported decision-making agreements for adults with disabilities, as an alternative to guardianship.
  • Aims to preserve decision-making autonomy while providing practical supports for decision execution in areas such as housing, services, finances, and medical care.
  • Creates training, oversight, and evaluative mechanisms to ensure protections against abuse, coercion, or exploitation.

Key provisions and changes

  • Training program (new Section 16F½, Chapter 6A)

    • The Executive Office of Health and Human Services (EOHHS) must establish a state-sponsored training program on supported decision-making.
    • Training to be provided to supporters and decision-makers under 190B Chapter 5-601 et seq.
    • Curriculum to cover rights and obligations in 190B sections 5-602, and dispute resolution.
    • Requires broad consultation with state agencies, advocacy groups, professional associations, and adults who use supports.
    • Training must be accessible to individuals receiving it.
  • Educational records access (Chapter 71B amendments)

    • Adds a mandate for the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to post a sample form for decision-makers to request the release of educational records by decision-makers’ supporters or others.
  • Adult education/guardianship information (Chapter 71B amendments)

    • At the first IEP meeting after age 16, teams must inform students and families about the Office of Adult Guardianship and Conservatorship Oversight.
  • Recognition of supported decision-making in guardianship framework (Chapter 190B amendments)

    • Section 5-303: Include “supported decision-making agreement” as a consideration alongside limited guardianship when discussing decision-making arrangements.
    • Subsection (b)(9½) requires a copy of any supported decision-making agreement (SDMA) executed by the person alleged to be incapacitated, if available.
    • Sections 5-404(C)(3) and 5-404(B)(8½): Allow SDMAs to be considered in court-based oversight and guardianship processes.
  • Definitions and framework for SDMAs (New Chapter 190B, Section 5-601 et seq.)

    • Clears definitions for terms: adult, coercion, decision-maker, executed, supported decision-making, supporter.
    • Decision-maker: an adult who signs an SDMA with one or more supporters.
    • Supported decision-making: voluntary, written, plain-language agreement that supports decision-making without impeding self-determination.
    • Supports: can include information access, decision assistance, and communication support, within the scope defined by the agreement.
    • Supporters: adults who assist and sign the SDMA; must meet eligibility criteria and may be disqualified for prior abuse, exploitation, or other disqualifying conditions.
  • Roles and duties of supporters (Section 5-602)

    • A supporter must respect the decision-maker’s values and preferences, act in good faith, maintain confidentiality, and operate within the scope of the agreement.
    • Supporters may assist with decision-relevant information access, understanding options, and communicating wishes, but cannot unilaterally make decisions unless authorized by the agreement and applicable law.
    • Certain records access (financial, medical, educational) is permitted with appropriate authorization; limited power of attorney may be used for financial records, with accompanying rights to participate in discussions.
    • Supports must avoid conflicts of interest and must refrain from acting beyond the authority granted in the SDMA.
    • SDMA participants may bring civil action for damages if rights are violated.
  • Validity, execution, and safeguarding (Section 5-602)

    • An SDMA must be signed and dated by the decision-maker and all supporters in the presence of a notary; reasonable accommodations allowed (assistive tech, etc.).
    • Undue influence or coercion renders the SDMA invalid.
    • An SDMA is personalized, plainly written, identifies all parties, and details decision areas and access.
    • Third parties are protected when acting in reliance on an SDMA, provided they act in good faith.
    • SDMAs remain in effect until terminated or expired; termination rules specify timelines and methods for communication among involved parties.
    • Termination can occur by date, by mutual agreement, or unilateral termination by the decision-maker (with notice to supporters).
    • Suspension or guardianship scenarios can limit the SDMA scope; death or incapacity triggers termination or scope adjustment.
  • Oversight, protection, and reporting (Section 5-601, 5-507)

    • Disabled Persons Protection Commission, elder protection services, and related agencies may petition probate and family court to revoke or suspend a supporter’s role for abuse, neglect, exploitation, or failure to comply with duties.
    • Court processes include notice and an opportunity to be heard; indigent decision-makers may be appointed counsel.
    • Annual reporting of court findings on SDMA issues to relevant legislative committees.
  • Safeguards for abuse reporting and rights preservation

    • Individuals may report alleged abuse or exploitation to protection agencies or elder hotlines.
    • Mandated reporters must report suspected abuse or exploitation.
    • Execution of SDMAs is not a prerequisite for participation in services or activities.
    • SDMAs do not limit or replace existing rights to health care proxies or powers of attorney.
  • Legislative and regulatory oversight

    • A Special Legislative Commission (Authorization Documents Commission) is created to study and make recommendations on:
    • Expanding health care authorization registries to include SDMAs and other authorizations.
    • Creating online registries for authorizations (educational, financial, etc.) to verify current status of SDMAs.
    • Commission composition includes legislative leaders, health and service secretaries, agency commissioners, and representatives from professional and advocacy organizations.
    • Commission must report by June 1, 2027.
  • Effective dates and transition

    • Existing SDMAs executed before July 31, 2026 remain valid until July 31, 2027; after that, SDMAs must conform to the new statutory requirements.
    • Section 6 (related to effective date) takes effect July 31, 2026.
    • Training program implementation required within six months of passage.
    • Regulations for relevant agencies promulgated within six months for EOHHS, DESE (regarding 71B), and DHHS.

Affected parties and scope

  • Adults with disabilities who may use supported decision-making agreements (SDMAs).
  • Decision-makers and one or more supporters entering into SDMAs.
  • Family members, guardians, conservators, and potential guardianship evaluators who interact with SDMAs in court or service contexts.
  • Agencies: EOHHS, Department of Developmental Services, Department of Mental Health, Department of Public Health, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, Disability Law Center, Massachusetts Health and Hospital Association, Massachusetts Medical Society, Massachusetts Bankers Association, and related service providers.
  • Courts (Probate and Family Court) and protective services agencies for oversight and enforcement.
  • Legislative bodies and commissions overseeing implementation and registry development.

Procedural and timeline notes

  • Training program to be established and delivered; implementation within six months of act passage.
  • Regulations to be promulgated within six months for relevant agencies.
  • SDMAs enacted before 7/31/2026 remain valid until 7/31/2027; post-7/31/2027, SDMAs must meet new requirements.
  • A Special Legislative Commission will study and report by 6/1/2027; includes appointment by legislative leaders and various state officials.
  • Data and registry recommendations may lead to new online verification systems for SDMAs and related authorizations.

Overall impact

  • Creates a formal, rights-respecting framework for supported decision-making as an alternative to guardianship for adults with disabilities.
  • Enhances protections against coercion and abuse, with clear duties for supporters and enforcement pathways.
  • Expands information sharing and access to records in a controlled, rights-based manner.
  • Establishes statewide training and oversight to promote informed decision-making, access to records, and accountability.
  • Requires regulatory and administrative work across multiple state agencies and a legislative commission to guide future registry development and policy.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.